Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters) ›› 2020, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (8): 1046-1056.DOI: 10.1007/s40195-020-01072-6
Previous Articles Next Articles
Ren Li1, Jing Ren1, Guo-Jia Zhang1, Jun-Yang He2(), Yi-Ping Lu1(), Tong-Min Wang1, Ting-Ju Li1
Revised:
2020-03-28
Online:
2020-08-10
Published:
2020-08-06
Contact:
Jun-Yang He,Yi-Ping Lu
Ren Li, Jing Ren, Guo-Jia Zhang, Jun-Yang He, Yi-Ping Lu, Tong-Min Wang, Ting-Ju Li. Novel (CoFe2NiV0.5Mo0.2)100-xNbx Eutectic High-Entropy Alloys with Excellent Combination of Mechanical and Corrosion Properties[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2020, 33(8): 1046-1056.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
Fig. 1 a XRD patterns of (CoFe2NiV0.5Mo0.2)100-xNbx EHEAs, b lattice parameters of the FCC solid solution and the Laves phase extracted from the XRD results in a, as a function of the Nb addition
Alloys | Region | Co | Fe | Ni | V | Mo | Nb |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nb0 | DR | 21.36 | 44.27 | 21.07 | 9.37 | 3.94 | - |
ID | 20.02 | 39.10 | 18.86 | 13.63 | 8.40 | - | |
Nb2 | DR | 20.91 | 42.64 | 20.34 | 10.28 | 4.58 | 1.26 |
ID | 21.83 | 39.36 | 19.91 | 10.62 | 6.07 | 2.21 | |
E | 16.49 | 34.56 | 19.25 | 12.19 | 9.89 | 7.62 | |
Nb4 | DR | 19.83 | 43.63 | 20.49 | 9.94 | 3.88 | 2.24 |
ID | 20.08 | 42.31 | 18.72 | 11.53 | 4.66 | 2.70 | |
E | 17.50 | 31.13 | 13.96 | 7.02 | 10.50 | 19.89 | |
Nb6 | A | 20.41 | 42.23 | 19.36 | 10.61 | 3.96 | 3.42 |
E | 18.36 | 35.32 | 17.15 | 8.82 | 5.63 | 14.71 | |
Nb8 | A | 18.91 | 43.00 | 20.60 | 10.60 | 3.36 | 3.53 |
E | 19.33 | 30.20 | 14.03 | 6.77 | 5.88 | 23.79 | |
Nb9 | E | 19.00 | 35.25 | 17.38 | 8.59 | 5.29 | 14.49 |
Nb10 | E | 19.15 | 35.79 | 18.46 | 9.72 | 4.49 | 12.37 |
B | 17.97 | 34.15 | 12.19 | 5.04 | 7.56 | 23.08 | |
Nb12 | E | 18.60 | 37.15 | 24.86 | 13.64 | 2.10 | 3.65 |
B | 18.31 | 33.72 | 11.55 | 5.01 | 6.62 | 24.80 |
Table 1 EDS results of (CoFe2NiV0.5Mo0.2)100-xNbx EHEAs (at%)
Alloys | Region | Co | Fe | Ni | V | Mo | Nb |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nb0 | DR | 21.36 | 44.27 | 21.07 | 9.37 | 3.94 | - |
ID | 20.02 | 39.10 | 18.86 | 13.63 | 8.40 | - | |
Nb2 | DR | 20.91 | 42.64 | 20.34 | 10.28 | 4.58 | 1.26 |
ID | 21.83 | 39.36 | 19.91 | 10.62 | 6.07 | 2.21 | |
E | 16.49 | 34.56 | 19.25 | 12.19 | 9.89 | 7.62 | |
Nb4 | DR | 19.83 | 43.63 | 20.49 | 9.94 | 3.88 | 2.24 |
ID | 20.08 | 42.31 | 18.72 | 11.53 | 4.66 | 2.70 | |
E | 17.50 | 31.13 | 13.96 | 7.02 | 10.50 | 19.89 | |
Nb6 | A | 20.41 | 42.23 | 19.36 | 10.61 | 3.96 | 3.42 |
E | 18.36 | 35.32 | 17.15 | 8.82 | 5.63 | 14.71 | |
Nb8 | A | 18.91 | 43.00 | 20.60 | 10.60 | 3.36 | 3.53 |
E | 19.33 | 30.20 | 14.03 | 6.77 | 5.88 | 23.79 | |
Nb9 | E | 19.00 | 35.25 | 17.38 | 8.59 | 5.29 | 14.49 |
Nb10 | E | 19.15 | 35.79 | 18.46 | 9.72 | 4.49 | 12.37 |
B | 17.97 | 34.15 | 12.19 | 5.04 | 7.56 | 23.08 | |
Nb12 | E | 18.60 | 37.15 | 24.86 | 13.64 | 2.10 | 3.65 |
B | 18.31 | 33.72 | 11.55 | 5.01 | 6.62 | 24.80 |
Fig. 2 SEM images of a Nb0, b Nb2, c Nb4, d Nb6, e Nb8, f Nb9, g Nb10, h Nb12, showing the microstructure evolution from hypoeutectic to fully eutectic and finally hypereutectic with flower-like primary Laves phase
Fig. 4 Elemental mappings of the Co, Ni, Fe, V, Mo and Nb in the Nb10 alloy using EPMA, the concentration of Nb/Mo in primary Laves phase and the segregation of V/Nb at the edge of eutectic cell were shown
Co | Fe | Ni | V | Mo | Nb | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Co (1.251 Å) | 0 | - 1 | 0 | - 14 | - 5 | - 25 | |
Fe (1.241 Å) | - | 0 | - 2 | - 7 | - 2 | - 16 | |
Ni (1.246 Å) | - | - | 0 | - 18 | - 7 | - 30 | |
V (1.316 Å) | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | - 1 | |
Mo (1.363 Å) | - | - | 0 | - 6 | |||
Nb (1.429 Å) | - | - | - | - | 0 |
Table 2 Values of ΔHmix (kJ/mol) and atomic sizes of the elements
Co | Fe | Ni | V | Mo | Nb | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Co (1.251 Å) | 0 | - 1 | 0 | - 14 | - 5 | - 25 | |
Fe (1.241 Å) | - | 0 | - 2 | - 7 | - 2 | - 16 | |
Ni (1.246 Å) | - | - | 0 | - 18 | - 7 | - 30 | |
V (1.316 Å) | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | - 1 | |
Mo (1.363 Å) | - | - | 0 | - 6 | |||
Nb (1.429 Å) | - | - | - | - | 0 |
Alloys | ΔHmix (kJ/mol) | δ (%) | ΔSmix (J/(K mol)) | VEC | ΔX | $\stackrel{-}{Md}$ | Tm (K) | Ω |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nb0 | - 5.831 | 3.00 | 11.60 | 8.23 | 0.103 | 0.915 | 1867.1 | 3.71 |
Nb2 | - 7.079 | 3.64 | 12.18 | 8.17 | 0.107 | 0.939 | 1884.6 | 3.24 |
Nb4 | - 8.272 | 4.16 | 12.53 | 8.10 | 0.111 | 0.963 | 1902.1 | 2.88 |
Nb6 | - 9.410 | 4.59 | 12.79 | 8.04 | 0.115 | 0.987 | 1919.6 | 2.61 |
Nb8 | - 10.491 | 4.96 | 12.99 | 7.98 | 0.119 | 1.011 | 1937.0 | 2.40 |
Nb9 | - 11.011 | 5.13 | 13.07 | 7.94 | 0.121 | 1.023 | 1945.8 | 2.31 |
Nb10 | - 11.517 | 5.29 | 13.14 | 7.91 | 0.123 | 1.035 | 1954.5 | 2.23 |
Nb12 | - 12.487 | 5.58 | 13.26 | 7.85 | 0.126 | 1.060 | 1972.0 | 2.09 |
Table 3 Calculated parameters of (CoFe2NiV0.5Mo0.2)100-xNbx EHEAs
Alloys | ΔHmix (kJ/mol) | δ (%) | ΔSmix (J/(K mol)) | VEC | ΔX | $\stackrel{-}{Md}$ | Tm (K) | Ω |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nb0 | - 5.831 | 3.00 | 11.60 | 8.23 | 0.103 | 0.915 | 1867.1 | 3.71 |
Nb2 | - 7.079 | 3.64 | 12.18 | 8.17 | 0.107 | 0.939 | 1884.6 | 3.24 |
Nb4 | - 8.272 | 4.16 | 12.53 | 8.10 | 0.111 | 0.963 | 1902.1 | 2.88 |
Nb6 | - 9.410 | 4.59 | 12.79 | 8.04 | 0.115 | 0.987 | 1919.6 | 2.61 |
Nb8 | - 10.491 | 4.96 | 12.99 | 7.98 | 0.119 | 1.011 | 1937.0 | 2.40 |
Nb9 | - 11.011 | 5.13 | 13.07 | 7.94 | 0.121 | 1.023 | 1945.8 | 2.31 |
Nb10 | - 11.517 | 5.29 | 13.14 | 7.91 | 0.123 | 1.035 | 1954.5 | 2.23 |
Nb12 | - 12.487 | 5.58 | 13.26 | 7.85 | 0.126 | 1.060 | 1972.0 | 2.09 |
Table 4 Calculated enthalpies of formation of the lowest energy structures of binary compounds relative to phase separation into pure elements (meV/atom)
Fig. 5 a Compression curves of (CoFe2NiV0.5Mo0.2)100-xNbx, b map of compressive strength and fracture strain combinations of various HEAs including (CoFe2NiV0.5Mo0.2)100-xNbx EHEAs showing advantages
Alloys | Yield strength (MPa) | Compressive strength (MPa) | Plastic strain (%) | Fracture strain (%) | Vickers hardness (HV) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nb0 | 199.0 | - | > 60 | > 60 | 147.6 |
Nb2 | 261.7 | - | > 60 | > 60 | 216.6 |
Nb4 | 476.4 | 2120.1 | 35.3 | 45.3 | 270.6 |
Nb6 | 883.4 | 2059.7 | 23.1 | 32.7 | 342.7 |
Nb8 | 1118.2 | 2050.8 | 19.3 | 28.2 | 393.5 |
Nb9 | 1449.2 | 2191.7 | 17.4 | 26.7 | 501.8 |
Nb10 | 1469.3 | 2433.2 | 19.4 | 27.7 | 476.1 |
Nb12 | 1310.5 | 1704.2 | 3.7 | 10.5 | 524.9 |
Table 5 Mechanical properties of the (CoFe2NiV0.5Mo0.2)100-xNbx EHEAs
Alloys | Yield strength (MPa) | Compressive strength (MPa) | Plastic strain (%) | Fracture strain (%) | Vickers hardness (HV) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nb0 | 199.0 | - | > 60 | > 60 | 147.6 |
Nb2 | 261.7 | - | > 60 | > 60 | 216.6 |
Nb4 | 476.4 | 2120.1 | 35.3 | 45.3 | 270.6 |
Nb6 | 883.4 | 2059.7 | 23.1 | 32.7 | 342.7 |
Nb8 | 1118.2 | 2050.8 | 19.3 | 28.2 | 393.5 |
Nb9 | 1449.2 | 2191.7 | 17.4 | 26.7 | 501.8 |
Nb10 | 1469.3 | 2433.2 | 19.4 | 27.7 | 476.1 |
Nb12 | 1310.5 | 1704.2 | 3.7 | 10.5 | 524.9 |
Sample | Ecorr (mV) | icorr (μA cm-2) | Epit (mV) | Average Epit - Ecorr (mV) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nb0 | - 252.36 | 4.2606 | - 43.25 | 209.11 |
Nb2 | - 318.8 | 4.0963 | 20.48 | 339.28 |
Nb4 | - 322.87 | 3.1789 | 79.19 | 402.06 |
Nb6 | - 310.18 | 3.4967 | 132.5 | 442.68 |
Nb8 | - 287.15 | 3.2805 | 199.9 | 487.05 |
Nb9 | - 337.46 | 4.6428 | 195.9 | 533.36 |
Nb10 | - 294.55 | 5.0078 | 261.1 | 555.65 |
Nb12 | - 351.21 | 7.1288 | 247.3 | 598.51 |
Table 6 Electrochemical data of (CoFe2NiV0.5Mo0.2)100-xNbx alloy system obtained from potentiodynamic polarization testing in 3.5 wt% NaCl at 298 ± 1 K
Sample | Ecorr (mV) | icorr (μA cm-2) | Epit (mV) | Average Epit - Ecorr (mV) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nb0 | - 252.36 | 4.2606 | - 43.25 | 209.11 |
Nb2 | - 318.8 | 4.0963 | 20.48 | 339.28 |
Nb4 | - 322.87 | 3.1789 | 79.19 | 402.06 |
Nb6 | - 310.18 | 3.4967 | 132.5 | 442.68 |
Nb8 | - 287.15 | 3.2805 | 199.9 | 487.05 |
Nb9 | - 337.46 | 4.6428 | 195.9 | 533.36 |
Nb10 | - 294.55 | 5.0078 | 261.1 | 555.65 |
Nb12 | - 351.21 | 7.1288 | 247.3 | 598.51 |
Fig. 8 Surface morphologies of a CoFe2NiV0.5Mo0.2, b (CoFe2NiV0.5Mo0.2)96Nb4, c (CoFe2NiV0.5Mo0.2)91Nb9, d (CoFe2NiV0.5Mo0.2)88Nb12 after corrosion in 3.5 wt% NaCl (at 298 ± 1 K)
[1] |
J.W. Yeh, S.K. Chen, S.J. Lin, J.Y. Gan, T.S. Chin, T.T. Shun, C.H. Tsau, S.Y. Chang, Adv. Eng. Mater. 6, 299 (2004)
DOI URL |
[2] | B. Cantor, I.T.H. Chang, P. Knight, A.J.B. Vincent, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 375, 213 (2004) |
[3] | Y. Zhang, T.T. Zuo, Z. Tang, M.C. Gao, K.A. Dahmen, P.K. Liaw, Z.P. Lu, Prog. Mater. Sci. 61, 1 (2014) |
[4] |
Z.M. Li, K.G. Pradeep, Y. Deng, D. Raabe, C.C. Tasan, Nature 534, 227 (2016)
URL PMID |
[5] | J.Y. He, H. Wang, H.L. Huang, X.D. Xu, M.W. Chen, Y. Wu, X.J. Liu, T.G. Nieh, K. An, Z.P. Lu, Acta Mater. 102, 187 (2016) |
[6] | Y.P. Lu, X.Z. Gao, L. Jiang, Z.N. Chen, T.M. Wang, J.C. Jie, H.J. Kang, Y.B. Zhang, S. Guo, H.H. Ruan, Y.H. Zhao, Z.Q. Cao, T.J. Li, Acta Mater. 124, 143 (2017) |
[7] | Y.X. Zhuang, W.J. Liu, P.F. Xing, F. Wang, J.C. He, Acta Met- all. Sin. (Engl. Lett.) 25, 124 (2012) |
[8] | J.B. Cheng, D. Liu, X.B. Liang, B.S. Xiu, Acta Metall. Sin. (Engl. Lett.) 27, 1031 (2014) |
[9] |
X.L. Shang, Z.J. Wang, Q.F. Wu, J.C. Wang, J.J. Li, J.K. Yu, Acta Metall. Sin. (Engl. Lett.) 32, 41 (2018)
DOI URL |
[10] |
F. He, Z.J. Wang, P. Cheng, Q. Wang, J.J. Li, Y.Y. Dang, J.C. Wang, C.T. Liu, J. Alloys Compd. 656, 284 (2016)
DOI URL |
[11] | W.Y. Huo, H. Zhou, F. Fang, Z.H. Xie, J.Q. Jiang, Mater. Des. 134, 226 (2017) |
[12] | W.Y. Huo, H. Zhou, F. Fang, X.F. Zhou, Z.H. Xie, J.Q. Jiang, J. Alloys Compd. 735, 897 (2018) |
[13] | D.L. Anton, D.M. Shah, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 410, 153 (1992) |
[14] | L. Machon, G. Sauthoff, Intermetallics 4, 469 (1996) |
[15] | D.J. Thoma, F. Chu, P. Peralta, P.G. Kotula, K.C. Chen, T.E. Mitchell, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 239, 251 (1997) |
[16] | B.A. Senior, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 119, L5 (1989) |
[17] | D.C. Kong, C.F. Dong, X.Q. Ni, L. Zhang, C. Man, J.Z. Yao, Y.C. Ji, Y.P. Ying, K. Xiao, X.Q. Cheng, X.G. Li, J. Alloys Compd. 785, 826 (2019) |
[18] |
Y. Zhang, Y.J. Zhou, J.P. Lin, G.L. Chen, P.K. Liaw, Adv. Eng. Mater. 10, 534 (2008)
DOI URL |
[19] | X. Yang, Y. Zhang, Mater. Chem. Phys. 132, 233 (2012) |
[20] | M.C. Troparevsky, J.R. Morris, P.R.C. Kent, A.R. Lupini, G.M. Stocks, Phys. Rev. X 5, 11 (2015) |
[21] |
M.C. Troparevsky, J.R. Morris, M. Daene, Y. Wang, A.R. Lupini, G.M. Stocks, JOM 67, 2350 (2015)
DOI URL |
[22] |
R. Sriharitha, B.S. Murty, R.S. Kottada, Intermetallics 32, 119 (2013)
DOI URL |
[23] | G.A. Salishchev, M.A. Tikhonovsky, D.G. Shaysultanov, N.D. Stepanov, A.V. Kuznetsov, I.V. Kolodiy, A.S. Tortika, O.N. Sen- kov, J. Alloys Compd. 591, 11 (2014) |
[24] | S.Q. Fang, W.P. Chen, Z.Q. Fu, Mater. Des. 54, 973 (2014) |
[25] | C.M. Liu, H.M. Wang, S.Q. Zhang, H.B. Tang, A.L. Zhang, J. Alloys Compd. 583, 162 (2014) |
[26] |
C. Ng, S. Guo, J. Luan, S.Q. Shi, Intermetallics 31, 165 (2012)
DOI URL |
[27] |
Z. Wang, Y. Huang, Y. Yang, J. Wang, C.T. Liu, Scr. Mater. 94, 28 (2012)
DOI URL |
[28] | S. Guo, C. Ng, J. Lu, C.T. Liu, J. Appl. Phys. 109, 103505 (2011) |
[29] | Z. Wu, H. Bei, F. Otto, G.M. Pharr, E.P. George, Intermetallics 46, 131 (2014) |
[30] | C. Pang, Q. Wang, R.Q. Zhang, Q. Li, X. Dai, C. Dong, P.K. Liaw, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 626, 369 (2015) |
[31] | Y. Dong, Y.P. Lu, L. Jiang, T.M. Wang, T.J. Li, Intermetallics 52, 105 (2014) |
[32] | Y.P. Lu, Y. Dong, L. Jiang, T.M. Wang, T.J. Li, Y. Zhang, Entropy 17, 2355 (2015) |
[33] | H.T. Zheng, R.R. Chen, G. Qin, X.Z. Li, Y.Q. Su, H.S. Ding, J.J. Guo, H.Z. Fu, Intermetallics 113, 106569 (2019) |
[34] | K.G. Kreider, Metallic Matrix Composites: Composite Materials (Academic Press, New York, 1974) |
[35] | M. Alger, Polymer Science Dictionary (Springer, Dordrecht, 1996) |
[36] | B.J. Shaw, Acta Metall. 15, 1169 (1967) |
[37] | G.A. Chadwick, Acta Metall. 24, 1137 (1976) |
[38] | H.P. Chou, Y.S. Chang, S.K. Chen, J.W. Yeh, Mater. Sci. Eng. B 163, 184 (2009) |
[39] | M.S. Lucas, G.B. Wilks, L. Mauger, J.A. Muñoz, O.N. Senkov, E. Michel, J. Horwath, S.L. Semiatin, M.B. Stone, D.L. Abernathy, E. Karapetrova, Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 251 (2012) |
[40] | L.J. Santodonato, Y. Zhang, M. Feygenson, C.M. Parish, M.C. Weber, R.J.K. Gao, J.C. Neuefeind, Z. Tang, P.K. Liaw,, Nat. Com- mun. 6, 59 (2015) |
[1] | Chun-Hua Ma, Fu-Sheng Pan, Ding-Fei Zhang, Ai-Tao Tang, Zhi-Wen Lu. Effects of Sb Addition on Microstructural Evolution and Mechanical Properties of Mg-9Al-5Sn Alloy [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2021, 34(2): 278-288. |
[2] | L. B. Tong, J. H. Chu, D. N. Zou, Q. Sun, S. Kamado, H. G. Brokmeier, M. Y. Zheng. Simultaneously Enhanced Mechanical Properties and Damping Capacities of ZK60 Mg Alloys Processed by Multi-Directional Forging [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2021, 34(2): 265-277. |
[3] | Hua-Ping Tang, Qu-Dong Wang, Colin Luo, Chuan Lei, Tian-Wen Liu, Zhong-Yang Li, Kui Wang, Hai-Yan Jiang, Wen-Jiang Ding. Effects of Solution Treatment on the Microstructure, Tensile Properties, and Impact Toughness of an Al-5.0Mg-3.0Zn-1.0Cu Cast Alloy [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2021, 34(1): 98-110. |
[4] | Lin-Yue Jia, Wen-Bo Du, Jin-Long Fu, Zhao-Hui Wang, Ke Liu, Shu-Bo Li, Xian Du. Obtaining Ultra-High Strength and Ductility in a Mg-Gd-Er-Zn-Zr Alloy via Extrusion, Pre-deformation and Two-Stage Aging [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2021, 34(1): 39-44. |
[5] | Meichen Liang, Hao Zhang, Lifeng Zhang, Peng Xue, Dingrui Ni, Weizhen Wang, Zongyi Ma, Hengqiang Ye, Zhiqing Yang. Evolution of Quasicrystals and Long-Period Stacking Ordered Structures During Severe Plastic Deformation and Mixing of Dissimilar Mg Alloys Upon Friction Stir Welding [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2021, 34(1): 12-24. |
[6] | Jinglin Liu, Qi Song, Lihui Song, Shude Ji, Mingshen Li, Zhen Jia, Kang Yang. A Novel Friction Stir Spot Riveting of Al/Cu Dissimilar Materials [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2021, 34(1): 135-144. |
[7] | Xi Zhao, Fa-Fa Yan, Zhi-Min Zhang, Peng-Cheng Gao, Shu-Chang Li. Influence of Heat Treatment on Precipitation Behavior and Mechanical Properties of Extruded AZ80 Magnesium Alloy [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2021, 34(1): 54-64. |
[8] | Chao-Yue Zhao, Xian-Hua Chen, Peng Peng, Teng Tu, Andrej Atrens, Fu-Sheng Pan. Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of Mg-xAl-1Sn-0.3Mn (x = 1, 3, 5) Alloy Sheets [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2020, 33(9): 1217-1225. |
[9] | Tianbo Zhao, Yutaka S. Sato, Hiroyuki Kokawa, Kazuhiro Ito. Predicting Tensile Properties of Friction-Stir-Welded 6063 Aluminum with Experimentally Measured Welding Heat Input [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2020, 33(9): 1235-1242. |
[10] | Dan-Yang Liu, Jin-Feng Li, Yong-Cheng Lin, Peng-Cheng Ma, Yong-Lai Chen, Xu-Hu Zhang, Rui-Feng Zhang. Cu/Li Ratio on the Microstructure Evolution and Corrosion Behaviors of Al-xCu-yLi-Mg Alloys [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2020, 33(9): 1201-1216. |
[11] | Xudong Du, Feng Wang, Zhi Wang, Xingxing Li, Zheng Liu, Pingli Mao. Hot Tearing Susceptibility of AXJ530 Alloy Under Low-Frequency Alternating Magnetic Field [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2020, 33(9): 1259-1270. |
[12] | Yuan Yu, Peiying Shi, Kai Feng, Jiongjie Liu, Jun Cheng, Zhuhui Qiao, Jun Yang, Jinshan Li, Weimin Liu. Effects of Ti and Cu on the Microstructure Evolution of AlCoCrFeNi High-Entropy Alloy During Heat Treatment [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2020, 33(8): 1077-1090. |
[13] | Hui Jiang, Tian-Dang Huang, Chao Su, Hong-Bin Zhang, Kai-Ming Han, Sheng-Xue Qin. Microstructure and Mechanical Behavior of CrFeNi2V0.5Wx (x = 0, 0.25) High-Entropy Alloys [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2020, 33(8): 1117-1123. |
[14] | Ibrahim Ondicho, Bernard Alunda, Dicken Owino, Luke Otieno, Melody Chepkoech. Revealing a Transformation-Induced Plasticity (TRIP) Phenomenon in a Medium-Entropy Alloy [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2020, 33(8): 1159-1165. |
[15] | Jia-Qi Zhao, Hua Tian, Zhong Wang, Xue-Jiao Wang, Jun-Wei Qiao. FCC-to-HCP Phase Transformation in CoCrNix Medium-Entropy Alloys [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2020, 33(8): 1151-1158. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||