Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters) ›› 2017, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (7): 630-640.DOI: 10.1007/s40195-017-0555-x
• Orginal Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Z.G. Liu1, T.I. Wong2, W. Huang1, N. Sridhar1, S.J. Wang2()
Received:
2016-10-05
Revised:
2016-11-24
Online:
2017-07-20
Published:
2017-08-22
About author:
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Z.G. Liu, T.I. Wong, W. Huang, N. Sridhar, S.J. Wang. Effect of Surface Polishing Treatment on the Fatigue Performance of Shot-Peened Ti-6Al-4V Alloy[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2017, 30(7): 630-640.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
Al | V | C | N | O | H | Fe | Y | Ti | Others |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6.12 | 4.0 | 0.08 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.0125 | 0.3 | 0.005 | 0.1 | Balance |
Table 1 Chemistry components of Ti-6Al-4V alloy
Al | V | C | N | O | H | Fe | Y | Ti | Others |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6.12 | 4.0 | 0.08 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.0125 | 0.3 | 0.005 | 0.1 | Balance |
Tests | Test labels | Specimens | Processes |
---|---|---|---|
First batch | T1-1 | Intrinsic | Specimen without any treatment |
T1-2 | SP30 | Specimen with shot peening under pressure 30 psi | |
T1-3 | SP50 | Specimen with shot peening under pressure 50 psi | |
T1-4 | SP70 | Specimen with shot peening under pressure 70 psi | |
T1-5 | SP30 V | Specimen with shot peening under pressure 30 psi + surface polishing | |
T1-6 | SP50 V | Specimen with shot peening under pressure 50 psi + surface polishing | |
T1-7 | SP70 V | Specimen with shot peening under pressure 70 psi + surface polishing | |
Second batch | T2-1 | Intrinsic | Specimen without any treatment |
T2-2 | VS | Specimen with surface polishing only | |
T2-3 | VSP30 | Specimen with surface polishing + shot peening under pressure 30 psi | |
T2-4 | VSP50 | Specimen with surface polishing + shot peening under pressure 50 psi | |
T2-5 | VSP60 | Specimen with surface polishing + shot peening under pressure 60 psi | |
T2-6 | VSP70 | Specimen with surface polishing + shot peening under pressure 70 psi | |
Third batch | T3-1 | Intrinsic | Specimen without any treatment |
T3-2 | VS | Specimen with surface polishing only | |
T3-3 | VSP | Specimen with surface polishing + shot peening | |
T3-4 | VSP2H | Specimen with surface polishing + shot peening + 2 h surface polishing | |
T3-5 | VSP4H | Specimen with surface polishing + shot peening + 4 h surface polishing | |
T3-6 | VSP6H | Specimen with surface polishing + shot peening + 6 h surface polishing | |
T3-7 | VSP8H | Specimen with surface polishing + shot peening + 8 h surface polishing |
Table 2 Treatment processes under various conditions
Tests | Test labels | Specimens | Processes |
---|---|---|---|
First batch | T1-1 | Intrinsic | Specimen without any treatment |
T1-2 | SP30 | Specimen with shot peening under pressure 30 psi | |
T1-3 | SP50 | Specimen with shot peening under pressure 50 psi | |
T1-4 | SP70 | Specimen with shot peening under pressure 70 psi | |
T1-5 | SP30 V | Specimen with shot peening under pressure 30 psi + surface polishing | |
T1-6 | SP50 V | Specimen with shot peening under pressure 50 psi + surface polishing | |
T1-7 | SP70 V | Specimen with shot peening under pressure 70 psi + surface polishing | |
Second batch | T2-1 | Intrinsic | Specimen without any treatment |
T2-2 | VS | Specimen with surface polishing only | |
T2-3 | VSP30 | Specimen with surface polishing + shot peening under pressure 30 psi | |
T2-4 | VSP50 | Specimen with surface polishing + shot peening under pressure 50 psi | |
T2-5 | VSP60 | Specimen with surface polishing + shot peening under pressure 60 psi | |
T2-6 | VSP70 | Specimen with surface polishing + shot peening under pressure 70 psi | |
Third batch | T3-1 | Intrinsic | Specimen without any treatment |
T3-2 | VS | Specimen with surface polishing only | |
T3-3 | VSP | Specimen with surface polishing + shot peening | |
T3-4 | VSP2H | Specimen with surface polishing + shot peening + 2 h surface polishing | |
T3-5 | VSP4H | Specimen with surface polishing + shot peening + 4 h surface polishing | |
T3-6 | VSP6H | Specimen with surface polishing + shot peening + 6 h surface polishing | |
T3-7 | VSP8H | Specimen with surface polishing + shot peening + 8 h surface polishing |
Tests | Specimens | Pressure (psi) | Shot flow rate (lb/min) | Intensity(A) | Nozzle distance (inch) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
First batch | Intrinsic | ||||
SP30, SP30 V | 30 | 10 | 6-8 | 4 | |
SP50, SP50 V | 50 | 10 | 6-8 | 8 | |
SP70, SP70 V | 70 | 10 | 8-11 | 15 | |
Second batch | Intrinsic, VS | ||||
VSP30 | 30 | 10 | 6-8 | 4 | |
VSP50 | 50 | 10 | 6-8 | 8 | |
VSP60 | 60 | 10 | 6-8 | 15 | |
VSP70 | 70 | 10 | 8-11 | 15 | |
Third batch | VSP | 30 | 10 | 6-8 | 4 |
VSP2H, VSP4H | 30 | 10 | 6-8 | 4 | |
VSP6H, VSP8H | 30 | 10 | 6-8 | 4 |
Table 3 Shot peening test configuration under various conditions
Tests | Specimens | Pressure (psi) | Shot flow rate (lb/min) | Intensity(A) | Nozzle distance (inch) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
First batch | Intrinsic | ||||
SP30, SP30 V | 30 | 10 | 6-8 | 4 | |
SP50, SP50 V | 50 | 10 | 6-8 | 8 | |
SP70, SP70 V | 70 | 10 | 8-11 | 15 | |
Second batch | Intrinsic, VS | ||||
VSP30 | 30 | 10 | 6-8 | 4 | |
VSP50 | 50 | 10 | 6-8 | 8 | |
VSP60 | 60 | 10 | 6-8 | 15 | |
VSP70 | 70 | 10 | 8-11 | 15 | |
Third batch | VSP | 30 | 10 | 6-8 | 4 |
VSP2H, VSP4H | 30 | 10 | 6-8 | 4 | |
VSP6H, VSP8H | 30 | 10 | 6-8 | 4 |
Fig. 3 a Distribution of residual stress along the variation of depths for different shot peening pressures. b Influence of the various polishing times on the distribution of the residual stress of specimen
Tests | Specimens | Surface stress (MPa) | Max compressive stress (MPa) | Depth of max compressive stress (μm) | Depth of zero crossing (μm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
First batch | Intrinsic | 27 | -22 | 80 | ~320 |
SP30, SP30 V | -815 | -815 | 16 | 192 | |
SP50, SP50 V | -775 | -775 | 16 | 192 | |
SP70, SP70 V | -788 | -817 | 48 | 192 | |
Second batch | Intrinsic | 101 | -33 | 88 | 420 |
VSP30 | -670 | -749 | 40 | 192 | |
VSP50 | -681 | -756 | 40 | 224 | |
VSP60 | -699 | -790 | 56 | 264 | |
VSP70 | -741 | -845 | 72 | 264 | |
Third batch | Intrinsic | 101 | -33 | 88 | 480 |
VS | -14 | -25 | 24 | 480 | |
VSP | -658 | -783 | 40 | 192 | |
VSP2H | -758 | -784 | 40 | 192 | |
VSP4H | -613 | -754 | 40 | 192 | |
VSP6H | -646 | -804 | 40 | 191 | |
VSP8H | -659 | -767 | 40 | 190 |
Table 4 Residual stress and depth of compression zone under various conditions
Tests | Specimens | Surface stress (MPa) | Max compressive stress (MPa) | Depth of max compressive stress (μm) | Depth of zero crossing (μm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
First batch | Intrinsic | 27 | -22 | 80 | ~320 |
SP30, SP30 V | -815 | -815 | 16 | 192 | |
SP50, SP50 V | -775 | -775 | 16 | 192 | |
SP70, SP70 V | -788 | -817 | 48 | 192 | |
Second batch | Intrinsic | 101 | -33 | 88 | 420 |
VSP30 | -670 | -749 | 40 | 192 | |
VSP50 | -681 | -756 | 40 | 224 | |
VSP60 | -699 | -790 | 56 | 264 | |
VSP70 | -741 | -845 | 72 | 264 | |
Third batch | Intrinsic | 101 | -33 | 88 | 480 |
VS | -14 | -25 | 24 | 480 | |
VSP | -658 | -783 | 40 | 192 | |
VSP2H | -758 | -784 | 40 | 192 | |
VSP4H | -613 | -754 | 40 | 192 | |
VSP6H | -646 | -804 | 40 | 191 | |
VSP8H | -659 | -767 | 40 | 190 |
Fig. 6 SEM images of surface morphologies for the specimens under various shot peening pressures in the first batch of tests for: a SP30, b SP50, c SP70
Fig. 7 Fractographic images of specimens in the first batch of tests for: a intrinsic, b SP30, c SP50, d SP70. The red dotted line denotes the border of different layers, while the yellow dotted circle denotes the void located zone
Fig. 8 Fractographic images of specimens under shot peening and post-peening polishing treatments in the first batch of tests for: a SPV30, b SPV50, c SPV70. The red dotted line denotes the border of different layers, while the yellow dotted circle denotes the void located zone
|
[1] | Rendong Liu, Zhiyuan Liang, Li Lin, Mingxin Huang. Dislocation Source and Pile-up in a Twinning-induced Plasticity Steel at High-Cycle Fatigue [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2021, 34(2): 169-173. |
[2] | Jiaqi Hu, Qite Li, Hong Gao. Influence of Twinning Texture on the Corrosion Fatigue Behavior of Extruded Magnesium Alloys [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2021, 34(1): 65-76. |
[3] | Meng Yan, Cong Wang, Tianjiao Luo, Yingju Li, Xiaohui Feng, Qiuyan Huang, Yuansheng Yang. Effect of Pulsed Magnetic Field on the Residual Stress of Rolled Magnium Alloy AZ31 Sheet [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2021, 34(1): 45-53. |
[4] | Lu An, Yan-Tao Sun, Shan-Ping Lu, Zhen-Bo Wang. Enhanced Fatigue Property of Welded S355J2W Steel by Forming a Gradient Nanostructured Surface Layer [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2020, 33(9): 1252-1258. |
[5] | Shasha Zhang, Niels van Dijk, Sybrand van der Zwaag. A Review of Self-healing Metals: Fundamentals, Design Principles and Performance [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2020, 33(9): 1167-1179. |
[6] | Yanyan Hong, Penglin Gao, Hongjia Li, Changsheng Zhang, Guangai Sun. Fatigue Damage Mechanism of AL6XN Austenitic Stainless Steel at High Temperatures [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2020, 33(6): 799-807. |
[7] | Chenfan Yu, Yuan Zhong, Peng Zhang, Zhenjun Zhang, Congcong Zhao, Zhefeng Zhang, Zhijian Shen, Wei Liu. Effect of Build Direction on Fatigue Performance of L-PBF 316L Stainless Steel [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2020, 33(4): 539-550. |
[8] | Xiao-An Hu, Gao-Le Zhao, Yun Jiang, Xian-Feng Ma, Fen-Cheng Liu, Jia Huang, Cheng-Li Dong. Experimental Investigation on the LCF Behavior Affected by Manufacturing Defects and Creep Damage of One Selective Laser Melting Nickel-Based Superalloy at 815 °C [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2020, 33(4): 514-527. |
[9] | Siqi Xiang, Xinfang Zhang. Residual Stress Removal Under Pulsed Electric Current [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2020, 33(2): 281-289. |
[10] | Jiahua Zhang, Yi Yang, Sheng Cao, Zhiqiang Cao, Dmytro Kovalchuk, Songquan Wu, Enquan Liang, Xi Zhang, Wei Chen, Fan Wu, Aijun Huang. Fine equiaxed β grains and superior tensile property in Ti-6Al-4V alloy deposited by coaxial electron beam wire feeding additive manufacturing [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2020, 33(10): 1311-1320. |
[11] | Jian Zhang, Yuan-Yuan Guo, Mai Zhang, Zhen-Yu Yang, Yu-Shi Luo. Low-Cycle Fatigue and Creep-Fatigue Behaviors of a Second-Generation Nickel-Based Single-Crystal Superalloy at 760 °C [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2020, 33(10): 1423-1432. |
[12] | Zhi-Chao Ma, Xiao-Xi Ma, Hong-Wei Zhao, Fu Zhang, Li-Ming Zhou, Lu-Quan Ren. Novel Crystallization Behaviors of Zr-Based Metallic Glass Under Thermo-Mechanical Coupled Fatigue Loading Condition [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2019, 32(7): 797-802. |
[13] | Tao Sun, Yan Liu, Shu-Jun Li, Jian-Ping Li. Effect of HIP Treatment on Fatigue Notch Sensitivity of Ti-6Al-4V Alloy Fabricated by Electron Beam Melting [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2019, 32(7): 869-875. |
[14] | Wen-Chao Dong, Dian-Bao Gao, Shan-Ping Lu. Numerical Investigation on Residual Stresses of the Safe-End/Nozzle Dissimilar Metal Welded Joint in CAP1400 Nuclear Power Plants [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2019, 32(5): 618-628. |
[15] | Liu Liu, Jie Meng, Jin-Lai Liu, Hai-Feng Zhang, Xu-Dong Sun, Yi-Zhou Zhou. Effects of Crystal Orientations on the Low-Cycle Fatigue of a Single-Crystal Nickel-Based Superalloy at 980 °C [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2019, 32(3): 381-390. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||