Coupling Effect Mechanism of the δ-Ferrite and M23C6 on the Mechanical Properties of 9Cr-Steel Deposited Metals

doi:10.1007/s40195-024-01760-7

Abstract

Abstract:

9Cr ferritic/martensitic (9Cr F/M) steels are considered ideal structural materials for various nuclear energy systems. However, δ-ferrite (δ), as a controlled phase, may occur in its welds. Three deposited metals with different carbon contents (0.04, 0.07, and 0.10 wt%) were investigated using experimental and finite element simulation methods. The results showed that the incomplete peritectic reaction, the incomplete δ to austenite phase transition, and the segregation of ferrite-stabilized elements led to the residual δ. The amount and morphology of δ significantly influence the mechanical properties. After increasing the carbon content, the increase in strength comes mainly from precipitation strengthening and dislocation strengthening, the presence of δ will reduce the strength. During the impact process, δ affects the absorbed energy for the stable crack growth through its morphology, and M₂₃C₆ affects the crack formation energy through its quantity. By decreasing the carbon content to a certain extent, the reduction of M₂₃C₆ content and the generation of large polygonal δ can effectively improve the toughness of 9Cr-steel deposited metals.

Key words: Deposited metals, 9Cr-steels, δ-ferrite, Mechanical properties

Qishan Sun, Shitong Wei, Shanping Lu. Coupling Effect Mechanism of the δ-Ferrite and M₂₃C₆ on the Mechanical Properties of 9Cr-Steel Deposited Metals[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2025, 38(1): 121-138.

Figures/Tables 23

Fig. 1 a Butt weld groove after welding; b schematic diagram of welding joints and sampling positions; c dimensions of the impact sample; d dimensions of the tensile sample; e location of microstructural characterization; f cross-section sampling position of tensile sample; g cross-section sampling position of impact sample

Table 1 Welding parameters

Welding current (A)	Welding voltage (V)	Shielding gas	Gas flow rate (L/min)	Welding speed (mm/s)	Preheating temperature (℃)	Interpass temperature (℃)
180-182	13-16	99.9% Ar	15	1.7	250	150-200

Table 2 Chemical compositions of deposited metals (wt%)

Deposited metals	C	Cr	Mn	Mo	W	N	Ni	Si	V + Nb	Fe
04C	0.045	8.75	0.51	0.076	1.95	0.05	0.40	0.40	0.25	Bal.
07C	0.073	8.98	0.53	0.072	2.00	0.04	0.41	0.41	0.25	Bal.
10C	0.110	8.95	0.52	0.075	2.00	0.04	0.41	0.41	0.24	Bal.

Fig. 2 Microstructure images of deposited metals with different carbon contents: a-c the distribution of δ in 04C, 07C, and 10C samples, respectively; d-f SEM morphology of δ in 04C, 07C, and 10C samples, respectively; g-i the difference in the number of precipitates in 04C, 07C, and 10C samples, respectively

Table 3 FF in deposited metals according to Schneider's formula, with corresponding statistical results of δ and precipitates

Deposited metal	Cr_eq	Ni_eq	Ferrite factor (FF)	Area fraction of δ (%)	Mean radius of M₂₃C₆(nm)	Area fraction of M₂₃C₆ (%)
04C	12.21	2.98	9.23	22.97	35.45	5.75
07C	12.56	3.71	8.85	12.04	39.55	9.41
10C	12.53	4.70	7.83	2.33	58.95	18.6

Fig. 3 XRD results of the electrochemical extracted powder of deposited metals

Fig. 4 Representative TEM bright-field (BF) and STEM results of deposited metals with different carbon contents: a-c macro-view of precipitate distribution in 04C, 07C, and 10C samples; d zoom of the red rectangle in c and the diffraction pattern of M23C6; e the semiquantitative results of M23C6

Fig. 5 EBSD maps of deposited metals with different carbon contents: a-c inverse pole figures (IPFs) of 04C, 07C, and 10C samples, respectively; d-f distribution maps of grain boundaries in 04C, 07C and 10C samples, respectively

Table 4 Grain boundaries changes of deposited metals with different C contents

Deposited metal	LAGB length (μm)	HAGB length (μm)	Total length (μm)
04C	5581.88	3756.15	9338.03
07C	7093.45	6349.65	13,446.10
10C	11,917.53	14,461.92	26,379.45

Fig. 6 Tensile and impact properties of deposited metals with different carbon contents: a yield and tensile strength; b elongation; c stress-strain curve; d impact energy

Fig. 7 Thermo-calc calculation results of deposited metals: a variation of δ and γ fraction during high-temperature solidification; b variation of phase fraction of 10C sample; c Scheil non-equilibrium solidification calculation results

Fig. 8 SEM image of δ and the corresponding EDS mapping of Cr, W, and Si

Fig. 9 Evolution model of δ-ferrite with decreasing temperature: a incomplete peritectic reaction; b the δ-ferrite caused by segregation of dendrites; c solid-state phase transformation

Fig. 10 Results of nanoindentation experiments of deposited metals: a the load-depth curves of δ and martensite, respectively; b enlarged images of indentations of δ and martensite, respectively

Fig. 11 a Simulation of the microstructure of Fig. 2e; b the meshing diagram; c contour map of effective stress; d contour map of logarithmic strain

Table 5 Comparison of yield strength calculations for δ and martensite in the deposited metals

Deposited metal	${\sigma }_{\text{M}}$ (MPa)	${\sigma }_{\delta }$ (MPa)	${\sigma }_{\text{cal}}$ (MPa)	${\sigma }_{\text{exp}}$ (MPa)	Error between ${\sigma }_{\text{cal}}$ and ${\sigma }_{\text{exp}}$
04C	664.54	435.03	596.42	608.7	2.02%
07C	689.27	435.03	658.68	649.7	1.38%
10C	733.56	435.03	726.60	721.4	0.72%

Fig. 12 Cross-sectional characterization of the tensile specimens: a, b SEM image and inverse pole figure (IPF) of the 04C sample, respectively; c 07C sample; d 10C sample

Fig. 13 a XRD diffraction patterns of the three deposited metals; b zoom of the (200) diffraction peak

Table 6 Comparison of yield strength calculations for δ and martensite in the deposited metals

Deposited metal	${\sigma }_{\text{ppt},{M}_{23}{\text{C}}_{6}}$ (MPa)	${\sigma }_{\text{dis}}$ (MPa)	${\sigma }_{\delta }{V}_{\delta }$ (MPa)	Pct. of δ influence in ${\sigma }_{\text{exp}}$	${\sigma }_{\text{exp}}$ (MPa)
04C	258.54	446.66	99.93	16.4%	608.7
07C	338.40	494.93	52.38	8.1%	649.7
10C	440.00	569.63	10.14	1.4%	721.4

Fig. 14 Fracture morphologies of the impact specimens: a-c macro-morphology images and partially enlarged images of 04C, 07C and 10C samples, respectively; d-f the enlarged images of dimples in 04C, 07C and 10C samples, respectively

Fig. 15 Oscillographic impact curves and their eigenvalues results: a comparison of curves for 04C, 07C and 10C samples; b detailed division using curve 04C as an example; c absorbed impact energy in different stages

Table 7 Impact test results of the deposited metals

Deposited metal	W_in (J)	W_stable (J)	W_unstable (J)	W_r (J)	W_t (J)	F_m (kN)	F_iu (kN)	F_iu/F_m (%)
04C	55.22	75.46	0.86	4.53	136.06	20.57	13.39	65.1
07C	43.04	28.58	0.78	12.14	84.54	22.61	21.57	95.4
10C	40.05	60.58	1.42	12.45	114.05	22.96	16.48	71.8

Fig. 16 Cross-sectional characterization of the impact specimens: a KAM of 04C sample; b 04C sample; c 07C sample; d 10C sample

References 54

[1]	K.L. Murty, I. Charit, J. Nucl. Mater. 383, 189 (2008)
[2]	J.S. Cheon, C.B. Lee, B.O. Lee, J.P. Raison, T. Mizuno, F. Delage, J. Carmack, J. Nucl. Mater. 392, 324 (2009)
[3]	J. Chen, C. Liu, C. Wei, Y. Liu, H. Li, Acta Metall. Sin. -Engl. Lett. 32, 1151 (2019)
[4]	C. Liu, M. Zhao, T. Unenbayar, Y. Zhao, B. Xie, Y. Tian, Y. Shan, K. Yang, Acta Metall. Sin. -Engl. Lett. 32, 825 (2018)
[5]	D. Wu, W. Tian, K. Zhang, S. Lu, Sci. Technol. Weld. Join. 28, 242 (2022)
[6]	G. Chakraborty, J.G. Kumar, P. Vasantharaja, C.R. Das, S.K. Albert, K. Laha, J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 28, 876 (2019) DOI
[7]	A.E. Korneev, A.F. Gromov, A.M. Kiselev, Met. Sci. Heat Treat. 55, 445 (2013)
[8]	C. Pandey, M.M. Mahapatra, P. Kumar, N. Saini, J.G. Thakre, R.S. Vidyarthy, H.K. Narang, Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 18, 713 (2018)
[9]	L. Ma, Y. Zhong, Q. Ma, C. Yuan, J. Tsinghua Sci. Technol. 48, 1887 ( (2008)
[10]	J. Oñoro, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 180, 137 (2006)
[11]	J.C. Lippold, J. Nucl. Mater. 104, 1127 (1981)
[12]	X. Long, G. Cai, L. Svensson, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 270, 260 (1999)
[13]	L. Schäfer, J. Nucl. Mater. 258, 1336 (1998)
[14]	K.S. Chandravathi, K. Laha, K.B.S. Rao, S.L. Mannan, Mater. Sci. Technol. 17, 559 (2013)
[15]	R.G. Faulkner, J.A. Williams, E.G. Sanchez, A.W. Marshall, Mater. Sci. Technol. 19, 347 (2013)
[16]	P.J. Grobner, W.C. Hagel, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 11, 633 (1980)
[17]	K. Anderko, L. Schäfer, E. Materna-Morris, J. Nucl. Mater. 179, 492 (1991)
[18]	C. Cabet, F. Dalle, E. Gaganidze, J. Henry, H. Tanigawa, J. Nucl. Mater. 523, 510 (2019) DOI
[19]	D. Wu, S. Wei, S. Lu, Acta Metall. Sin. -Engl. Lett. 34, 628 (2020)
[20]	C. Pandey, M.M. Mahapatra, P. Kumar, R.S. Mulik, N. Saini, J.G. Thakre, Mater. Today: Proc. 5, 17080 (2018)
[21]	S.S. Mahlalela, P.G.H. Pistorius, Weld. World 66, 1191 (2022)
[22]	J. Liu, S. Wei, Q. Sun, C. Liu, S. Lu, J. Mater. Res. Technol. 23, 744 (2023)
[23]	C.R. Das, S.K. Albert, A.K. Bhaduri, B.S. Murty, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 42, 3849 (2011)
[24]	G. Chang, S. Chen, X. Yue, Q. Li, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 48, 1551 (2017)
[25]	H. Liu, M. Zhong, Y. Shen, Z. Wang, S. Basu, C. Wang, Mater. Charact. 200, 112864 (2023)
[26]	W. Yan, W. Sha, L. Zhu, W. Wang, Y. Shan, K. Yang, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 41, 159 (2009)
[27]	Ž Alar, D. Mandić,Metals 8, 511 (2018)
[28]	M. Zadra, G. Straffelini, A. Molinari, Mater. Sci. Technol. 24, 1259 (2013)
[29]	X. Hu, N. Xiao, X. Luo, D. Li, Acta Metall. Sin. -Engl. Lett. 45, 553 (2009)
[30]	E.J. Pavlina, C.J.V. Tyne, J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 17, 888 (2008)
[31]	N. Kamikawa, K. Sato, G. Miyamoto, M. Murayama, N. Sekido, K. Tsuzaki, T. Furuhara, Acta Mater. 83, 383 (2015)
[32]	Q. Lai, L. Brassart, O. Bouaziz, M. Gouné, M. Verdier, G. Parry, A. Perlade, Y. Bréchet, T. Pardoen, Int. J. Plast. 80, 187 (2016)
[33]	A.P. Pierman, O. Bouaziz, T. Pardoen, P.J. Jacques, L. Brassart, Acta Mater. 73, 298 (2014)
[34]	G. Chen, J. Wan, N. He, H. Zhang, F. Han, Y. Zhang, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. 28, 2395 (2018)
[35]	S.S. Naresh, C. Goel, K. Tangri, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 16, 2013 ( (1985)
[36]	Y. Zhao, M. Wang, Y. Lei, Y. Fan, A. Xue, X. Lin, J. Mater. Res. Technol. 28, 1597 (2024)
[37]	E. Hornbogen, E.A. Starke Jr, Acta Mater. 41, 1 (1992)
[38]	R. Shi, Z. Wang, L. Qiao, X. Pang, J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 35, 1940 ( (2019)
[39]	J. Sun, S. Lu, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 806, 140758 (2021)
[40]	W.L. Mammel, G.Y. Chin, Trans. Metall. Soc. AIME 239, 1400 (1967)
[41]	T. Fischer, T. Zhou, C.F.O. Dahlberg, P. Hedström, Int. J. Plast. 174, 103917 (2024)
[42]	T. Gladman, Mater. Sci. Technol. 15, 30 (2013)
[43]	D. Hull, D.J. Bacon, Defects in Crystals, Introduction to Dislocations (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2011), pp.1-20
[44]	M. Charleux, W.J. Poole, M. Militzer, A. Deschamps, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 32, 1635 (2001)
[45]	Y. Liu, Y. Jiang, J. Xing, R. Zhou, J. Feng, J. Alloys Compd. 648, 874 (2015)
[46]	A.S. Keh, Philos. Mag. 12, 9 (1965)
[47]	T.K.S. Takebayashi, N. Yoshinaga, K. Ushioda, S. Ogata, ISIJ Int. 50, 875 (2010)
[48]	C.E. Kril, R. Birringer, Philos. Mag. A 77, 621 (1998)
[49]	G.K. Williamson, R.E. Smallman, Philos. Mag. 1, 34 (1956)
[50]	W. Yan, W. Wang, Y. Shan, K. Yang, W. Sha, 9-12Cr Heat-Resistant Steels (Springer, Cham, 2015), pp.47-64
[51]	G. Alkan, D. Chae, S.J. Kim, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 585, 39 (2013)
[52]	Y. Lin, Q. Yu, J. Pan, F. Duan, R.O. Ritchie, Y. Li, Acta Mater. 193, 125 (2020)
[53]	L. Li, Y. Wang, Weld. J. 95, 27 (2016)
[54]	A. Khajuria, M. Akhtar, R. Bedi, R. Kumar, M. Ghosh, C.R. Das, S.K. Albert, Mater. Sci. Technol. 36, 1407 (2020)

Coupling Effect Mechanism of the δ-Ferrite and M₂₃C₆ on the Mechanical Properties of 9Cr-Steel Deposited Metals

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 23

References 54

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Chenghao Liu, Wenchao Dong, Jian Sun, Shanping Lu. Effect of Precipitation Behavior and Deformation Twinning Evolution on the Mechanical Properties of 16Cr-25.5Ni-4.2Mo Superaustenitic Stainless Steel Weld Metals [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2025, 38(2): 338-352.
[2]	Ye Liu, Shuran Chu, Hui Guo, Mengyao Kong, Chenxi Liu, Jingwen Zhang, Ran Ding, Yongchang Liu. Enhancing the Strength of Medium Mn Steel by Flash Treatment [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2025, 38(1): 139-150.
[3]	Sai Chen, Shuangjie Chu, Bo Mao. Iron-Based Metal Matrix Composite: A Critical Review on the Microstructural Design, Fabrication Processes, and Mechanical Properties [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2025, 38(1): 1-44.
[4]	Zheng Liu, De-Chun Ren, Lian-Min Zhang, Ai-Li Ma, Hai-Bin Ji, Yu-Gui Zheng. Synergistic Improvement in Ductility and Hot Nitric Acid Corrosion Resistance of LPBF Ti-6Al-4V Alloy via Hot Isostatic Pressing [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2025, 38(1): 102-106.
[5]	Hongwei Yan, Yong’an Zhang, Wei Xiao, Boyu Xue, Rui Liu, Xiwu Li, Zhihui Li, Baiqing Xiong. Experimental and DFT Investigations of AlNbTiVZr High Entropy Alloys with Excellent Mechanical Properties [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2024, 37(9): 1480-1490.
[6]	Zirui Chen, Liyuan Wang, Jiayu Zhao, Guanhua Cui, Zhuo Gao, Zhiyuan Fan, Xiaohui Shi, Junwei Qiao. Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of the Ti₆₂Nb₁₂Mo₁₂Ta₁₂W₂ Refractory High Entropy Alloy Prepared through Spark Plasma Sintering [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2024, 37(8): 1387-1398.
[7]	Shasha Qu, Yingju Li, Bingyu Lu, Cuiping Wang, Yuansheng Yang. Effects of Boron Addition on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of γ′-Strengthened Directionally Solidified CoNi-Base Superalloy [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2024, 37(8): 1438-1452.
[8]	Guan-Cheng Gu, Zhao-Jing Han, Ze-Yu Chen, Zhao-Xuan Li, Sheng-Bao Xia, Zheng-Ning Li, Hua Jin, Wei-Wei Xu, Xing-Jun Liu. Theoretical Exploration of Alloying Effects on Stabilities and Mechanical Properties of γʹ Phase in Novel Co-Al-Nb-Base Superalloys [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2024, 37(7): 1238-1248.
[9]	Qi-Yu Liao, Da-Zhi Zhao, Qi-Chi Le, Wen-Xin Hu, Yan-Chao Jiang, Wei-Yang Zhou, Liang Ren, Dan-Dan Li, Zhao-Yang Yin. Effect of Artificial Cooling Extrusion on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Mg-Zn-Y Alloys [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2024, 37(7): 1115-1127.
[10]	Ziyue Xu, Huan Liu, Luyao Li, Chao Sun, Xi Tan, Baishan Chen, Qiangsheng Dong, Yuna Wu, Jinghua Jiang, Jiang Ma. Effect of Room Temperature Ultrasonic Vibration Compression on the Microstructure Evolution and Mechanical Properties of AZ91 Alloy [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2024, 37(7): 1135-1146.
[11]	Xiaofeng Ding, Zehao Wu, Tong Li, Jianxun Chen, Yuanhua Shuang, Baosheng Liu. Effect of Three-High Rotary Piercing Process on Microstructure, Texture and Mechanical Properties of Magnesium Alloy Seamless Tube [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2024, 37(6): 953-968.
[12]	Huanzhi Zhang, Tianxin Li, Qianqian Wang, Zhenbo Zhu, Hefei Huang, Yiping Lu. Effects of Nitrogen Doping on Microstructures and Irradiation Resistance of Ti-Zr-Nb-V-Mo Refractory High-Entropy Alloy [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2024, 37(6): 1007-1018.
[13]	Iman Ansarian, Reza Taghiabadi, Saeid Amini, Mohammad Hossein Mosallanejad, Luca Iuliano, Abdollah Saboori. Improvement of Surface Mechanical and Tribological Characteristics of L-PBF Processed Commercially Pure Titanium through Ultrasonic Impact Treatment [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2024, 37(6): 1034-1046.
[14]	Peng Chen, Wenhao Chen, Jiaxin Chen, Zhiyu Chen, Yang Tang, Ge Liu, Bensheng Huang, Zhiqing Zhang. Microstructure Evolution and Mechanical Properties of Friction Stir Welded Al-Cu-Li Alloy [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2024, 37(5): 855-871.
[15]	Xiang Kong, Yu Wang, Hong Xu, Haotian Fan, Yuewu Zheng, Beibei Xie. NbB₂ Modified Al-Cu Alloys Fabricated by Freeze-Ablation Casting under High Cooling Rate Solidification [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2024, 37(5): 921-938.