Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters) ›› 2020, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (1): 43-57.DOI: 10.1007/s40195-019-00971-7
• Original Paper • Previous Articles Next Articles
Wen Wang1,2,3, Peng Han1,2, Pai Peng1,2, Ting Zhang1,2, Qiang Liu1,2, Sheng-Nan Yuan1,2, Li-Ying Huang1,2, Hai-Liang Yu4, Ke Qiao1,2, Kuai-She Wang1,2()
Received:
2019-04-09
Revised:
2019-07-12
Online:
2020-01-10
Published:
2020-02-20
Contact:
Wang Kuai-She
Wen Wang, Peng Han, Pai Peng, Ting Zhang, Qiang Liu, Sheng-Nan Yuan, Li-Ying Huang, Hai-Liang Yu, Ke Qiao, Kuai-She Wang. Friction Stir Processing of Magnesium Alloys: A Review[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2020, 33(1): 43-57.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
Fig. 1 Microstructures of a BM, b FSPed, c aged samples, d legend and direction [23]. ND normal direction, PD processing direction, TD transverse direction
Preparation process | Loading direction | Grain size (µm) | $\sigma_{ 0}$ (MPa) | $k$(MPa·µm1/2) | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rolling | Tensile//rolling direction | 5.2-24 | 85 | 200 | [ |
Rolling | Tensile//rolling direction | 5.2-21.5 | 131 | 250 | [ |
Rolling | Tensile//rolling direction | 5-17.3 | 89 | 231 | [ |
Rolling | Tensile//transverse direction | 13-140 | 115 | 272 | [ |
Rolling | Tensile//rolling direction | 13-140 | 88 | 281 | [ |
Rolling | Tensile//normal direction | 26-78 | 12.2 | 228 | [ |
Rolling | Tensile∠normal direction?=?22.5° | 26-78 | 10.5 | 231 | [ |
Rolling | Tensile∠normal direction?=?45.0° | 26-78 | 18.2 | 158 | [ |
Rolling | Tensile∠normal direction?=?67.5° | 26-78 | 26.5 | 221 | [ |
Rolling | Tensile//transverse direction | 26-78 | 41.1 | 411 | [ |
Extrusion | Tensile//extrusion direction | 2.5-8.0 | 80 | 304 | [ |
Extrusion | Compressive//extrusion direction | 3-11 | 22 | 390 | [ |
ECAP | Tensile//extrusion direction | 5-32 | 30 | 170 | [ |
ECAP | - | - | 30 | 170 | [ |
ECAP | Tensile//extrusion direction | 2.2-8 | 30 | 180 | [ |
ECAP | Tensile//extrusion direction | 2.5-48.3 | 85.2 | 205 | [ |
ECAP | Tensile//extrusion direction | 2-55 | 122 | 207 | [ |
ECAP | Tensile//extrusion direction | 9-22 | 10 | 327 | [ |
ECAP?+?extrusion | Tensile//extrusion direction | 6-22 | 50 | 343 | [ |
Electron beam welding | Tensile//welding direction | 11-38 | 62 | 202 | [ |
FSP | Tensile//forward direction | 2.6-6.1 | 10 | 160 | [ |
Table 1 H-P parameters for AZ31 Mg alloy [51]
Preparation process | Loading direction | Grain size (µm) | $\sigma_{ 0}$ (MPa) | $k$(MPa·µm1/2) | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rolling | Tensile//rolling direction | 5.2-24 | 85 | 200 | [ |
Rolling | Tensile//rolling direction | 5.2-21.5 | 131 | 250 | [ |
Rolling | Tensile//rolling direction | 5-17.3 | 89 | 231 | [ |
Rolling | Tensile//transverse direction | 13-140 | 115 | 272 | [ |
Rolling | Tensile//rolling direction | 13-140 | 88 | 281 | [ |
Rolling | Tensile//normal direction | 26-78 | 12.2 | 228 | [ |
Rolling | Tensile∠normal direction?=?22.5° | 26-78 | 10.5 | 231 | [ |
Rolling | Tensile∠normal direction?=?45.0° | 26-78 | 18.2 | 158 | [ |
Rolling | Tensile∠normal direction?=?67.5° | 26-78 | 26.5 | 221 | [ |
Rolling | Tensile//transverse direction | 26-78 | 41.1 | 411 | [ |
Extrusion | Tensile//extrusion direction | 2.5-8.0 | 80 | 304 | [ |
Extrusion | Compressive//extrusion direction | 3-11 | 22 | 390 | [ |
ECAP | Tensile//extrusion direction | 5-32 | 30 | 170 | [ |
ECAP | - | - | 30 | 170 | [ |
ECAP | Tensile//extrusion direction | 2.2-8 | 30 | 180 | [ |
ECAP | Tensile//extrusion direction | 2.5-48.3 | 85.2 | 205 | [ |
ECAP | Tensile//extrusion direction | 2-55 | 122 | 207 | [ |
ECAP | Tensile//extrusion direction | 9-22 | 10 | 327 | [ |
ECAP?+?extrusion | Tensile//extrusion direction | 6-22 | 50 | 343 | [ |
Electron beam welding | Tensile//welding direction | 11-38 | 62 | 202 | [ |
FSP | Tensile//forward direction | 2.6-6.1 | 10 | 160 | [ |
Alloys | State | Grain size (μm) | Temperature (°C) | Strain rate (s-1) | Elongation (%) | Behavior | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AZ31 | Rolled | 11.4 | 450 | 5?×?10-4 | 1050 | [ | |
AZ31 | Rolled | 11.4 | 450 | 1?×?10-2 | 268 | HSRS | [ |
AZ31 | Rolled | 0.94-3.21 | 450 | 5?×?10-4 | 405 | [ | |
AZ61 | SiO2 | 0.8 | 400 | 3?×?10-1 | 454 | HSRS | [ |
AZ61 | 7-8 | 300 | 1?×?10-4 | 235 | [ | ||
AZ80 | Cast | - | 300 | 1.4?×?10-4 | 541 | [ | |
AZ91 | Cast | 4 | 300 | 5?×?10-4 | 1050 | LTSP | [ |
AZ91 | Cast | ~?3 | 300 | 1?×?10-4 | 1604 | LTSP | [ |
AZ91 | Cast | ~?3 | 350 | 2?×?10-2 | 207 | HSRS | [ |
AZ91 | Cast | 7.9 | 325 | 1?×?10-4 | 311 | [ | |
AZ91 | Cast | 0.5 | 330 | 1?×?10-2 | 1251 | HSRS | [ |
AZ91 | Cast | 0.5 | 330 | 3?×?10-2 | 827 | HSRS | [ |
AZ91 | Cast | 1.2 | 350 | 2?×?10-2 | 990 | HSRS | [ |
ZK60 | 2-5 | 275 | 3?×?10-4 | 940 | LTSP | [ | |
ZK60 | Extrusion | 2.9 | 300 | 3?×?10-4 | 1390 | LTSP | [ |
AM60B | Cast | 2.5 | 200 | 1?×?10-4 | ~550 | LTSP | [ |
AM60B | Cast | 2.5 | 300 | 1?×?10-4 | ~1280 | LTSP | [ |
MB8 | Rolled | 6 | 400 | 4?×?10-4 | 231.2 | [ | |
Mg-6.19Zn-1.1Y-0.46Zr | Extrusion | 5.2 | 450 | 3?×?10-3 | 635 | [ | |
Mg-6.19Zn-1.1Y-0.46Zr | Extrusion | 5.2 | 450 | 1?×?10-2 | 225 | HSRS | [ |
Mg-7.12Zn-1.2Y-0.84Zr | Rolled | 4.5 | 450 | 1?×?10-2 | 1110 | HSRS | [ |
Mg-7Zn-1.2Y-0.8Zr | 4.6 | 450 | 1?×?10-2 | 1200 | [ | ||
Mg-10Gd-3Y-0.5Zr | Cast | 6.1 | 415 | 1?×?10-3 | 1110 | [ | |
Mg-1.2Zn-1.7Y-0.53Al-0.27Mn | Rolled | 2.8 | 350 | 1?×?10-4 | 335 | [ | |
Mg-3.99Y-3.81Nd-0.53Zr | Cast | ~2 | 475 | 2?×?10-2 | 631 | HSRS | [ |
Mg-4.27Y-2.94Nd-0.51Zr | Cast | 1.3 | 485 | 1?×?10-1 | 549 | HSRS | [ |
Mg-2.08Ag-2.07Nd-0.6Zr | Cast | 0.63 | 450 | 1?×?10-2 | 1630 | HSRS | [ |
Mg-2.08Ag-2.07Nd-0.6Zr | Cast | 0.63 | 350 | 3?×?10-3 | 850 | LTSP | [ |
Table 2 Superplasticity parameters of FSPed Mg alloys
Alloys | State | Grain size (μm) | Temperature (°C) | Strain rate (s-1) | Elongation (%) | Behavior | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AZ31 | Rolled | 11.4 | 450 | 5?×?10-4 | 1050 | [ | |
AZ31 | Rolled | 11.4 | 450 | 1?×?10-2 | 268 | HSRS | [ |
AZ31 | Rolled | 0.94-3.21 | 450 | 5?×?10-4 | 405 | [ | |
AZ61 | SiO2 | 0.8 | 400 | 3?×?10-1 | 454 | HSRS | [ |
AZ61 | 7-8 | 300 | 1?×?10-4 | 235 | [ | ||
AZ80 | Cast | - | 300 | 1.4?×?10-4 | 541 | [ | |
AZ91 | Cast | 4 | 300 | 5?×?10-4 | 1050 | LTSP | [ |
AZ91 | Cast | ~?3 | 300 | 1?×?10-4 | 1604 | LTSP | [ |
AZ91 | Cast | ~?3 | 350 | 2?×?10-2 | 207 | HSRS | [ |
AZ91 | Cast | 7.9 | 325 | 1?×?10-4 | 311 | [ | |
AZ91 | Cast | 0.5 | 330 | 1?×?10-2 | 1251 | HSRS | [ |
AZ91 | Cast | 0.5 | 330 | 3?×?10-2 | 827 | HSRS | [ |
AZ91 | Cast | 1.2 | 350 | 2?×?10-2 | 990 | HSRS | [ |
ZK60 | 2-5 | 275 | 3?×?10-4 | 940 | LTSP | [ | |
ZK60 | Extrusion | 2.9 | 300 | 3?×?10-4 | 1390 | LTSP | [ |
AM60B | Cast | 2.5 | 200 | 1?×?10-4 | ~550 | LTSP | [ |
AM60B | Cast | 2.5 | 300 | 1?×?10-4 | ~1280 | LTSP | [ |
MB8 | Rolled | 6 | 400 | 4?×?10-4 | 231.2 | [ | |
Mg-6.19Zn-1.1Y-0.46Zr | Extrusion | 5.2 | 450 | 3?×?10-3 | 635 | [ | |
Mg-6.19Zn-1.1Y-0.46Zr | Extrusion | 5.2 | 450 | 1?×?10-2 | 225 | HSRS | [ |
Mg-7.12Zn-1.2Y-0.84Zr | Rolled | 4.5 | 450 | 1?×?10-2 | 1110 | HSRS | [ |
Mg-7Zn-1.2Y-0.8Zr | 4.6 | 450 | 1?×?10-2 | 1200 | [ | ||
Mg-10Gd-3Y-0.5Zr | Cast | 6.1 | 415 | 1?×?10-3 | 1110 | [ | |
Mg-1.2Zn-1.7Y-0.53Al-0.27Mn | Rolled | 2.8 | 350 | 1?×?10-4 | 335 | [ | |
Mg-3.99Y-3.81Nd-0.53Zr | Cast | ~2 | 475 | 2?×?10-2 | 631 | HSRS | [ |
Mg-4.27Y-2.94Nd-0.51Zr | Cast | 1.3 | 485 | 1?×?10-1 | 549 | HSRS | [ |
Mg-2.08Ag-2.07Nd-0.6Zr | Cast | 0.63 | 450 | 1?×?10-2 | 1630 | HSRS | [ |
Mg-2.08Ag-2.07Nd-0.6Zr | Cast | 0.63 | 350 | 3?×?10-3 | 850 | LTSP | [ |
Slip systems | SF |
---|---|
Basal slip {0001} $\left\langle {11\bar{2}0} \right\rangle$ | 0.252 |
Prismatic slip {10$\bar{1}0$} $\left\langle {11\bar{2}0} \right\rangle$ | 0.410 |
Pyramidal 〈a〉 slip {10$\bar{1}1$} $\left\langle {11\bar{2}0} \right\rangle$ | 0.425 |
Pyramidal 〈c?+?a〉 slip {11$\bar{2}1$} $\left\langle {11\bar{2}3} \right\rangle$ | 0.431 |
Pyramidal 〈c?+?a〉 slip {11${\bar{\text{2}}\text{2}}$} $\left\langle {11\bar{2}3} \right\rangle$ | 0.376 |
Table 3 Average SF values of FSPed sample for different slip systems
Slip systems | SF |
---|---|
Basal slip {0001} $\left\langle {11\bar{2}0} \right\rangle$ | 0.252 |
Prismatic slip {10$\bar{1}0$} $\left\langle {11\bar{2}0} \right\rangle$ | 0.410 |
Pyramidal 〈a〉 slip {10$\bar{1}1$} $\left\langle {11\bar{2}0} \right\rangle$ | 0.425 |
Pyramidal 〈c?+?a〉 slip {11$\bar{2}1$} $\left\langle {11\bar{2}3} \right\rangle$ | 0.431 |
Pyramidal 〈c?+?a〉 slip {11${\bar{\text{2}}\text{2}}$} $\left\langle {11\bar{2}3} \right\rangle$ | 0.376 |
Mg matrix | Reinforcing phase | Method of reinforcing particles introduction | Findings |
---|---|---|---|
Pure Mg [ AZ31 [ AZ91 [ RZ5 [ | MWCNTs | Groove?+?covering [ Groove [ Hole?+?melting?+?extrusion [ | The secondary phase strengthening and fine-grained strengthening of CNTs increase the microhardness of Mg-based SMMCs. CNTs lead to the occurrence of galvanic corrosion and the decrease in corrosion resistance of pure Mg. Low traverse speed is beneficial to the uniform distribution of MWCNTs. The elastic modulus, yield strength, and ultimate tensile strength increase, but the plasticity decreases |
AZ31 [ AZ91 [ | Carbon fiber | Sandwich [ | FSPed AZ91 Mg alloy has the characteristics of precipitation hardening and high hardness. The addition of carbon fibers reduces the plasticity of Mg-based SMMCs |
AZ31 [ AZ91 [ ZM21 [ | SiC | Hollow tool [ Groove [ Groove?+?covering [ Hole [ Hole?+?covering [ | The uniform distribution of SiC particles improves the strength of AZ91 Mg alloy. SiC particle-reinforced AZ91 Mg alloy has excellent friction and wear resistance. The microstructure with the addition of nano-SiC particles is more uniform than that with the addition of micron-SiC particles. Increasing the number of FSP passes can promote the uniform distribution of SiC particles |
AZ31 [ AZ61 [ | SiO2 | Groove [ Groove?+?covering [ | The addition of nano-SiO2 particles leads to the grain refinement and the formation of equiaxed ultrafine-grained structure. The hardness of Mg-based SMMCs reinforced by nano-SiO2 particles is increased by two times. Multipass FSP promotes the uniform distribution of SiO2 particles |
AZ31 [ AZ91 [ | Al2O3 | Groove?+?covering [ Groove [ | The distribution of Al2O3 particles is improved by increasing the rotational speed. Grain refinement is promoted by the addition of Al2O3 particles. Increasing the number of FSP passes can improve the uniformity of microstructure and refine grains |
RZ5 [ ZM21 [ | B4C | Groove?+?covering [ Hole?+?covering [ | Grain refinement is promoted by the addition of B4C particles. B4C particles promote wear resistance, due to grain boundary pinning and dispersion hardening |
AZ31 [ | TiC | Groove?+?covering [ Groove [ | TiC particles are uniformly distributed in the AZ31 Mg alloy matrix without agglomeration and interfacial reaction. TiC particles promote the grain refinement and the increase in microhardness |
AZ31 [ | ZrO2 | Groove [ | The addition of ZrO2 promotes the grain refinement and improves the strength and hardness of Mg-based SMMCs. Increasing the number of FSP passes reduces the particle agglomeration, promotes the grain refinement, and enhances the pinning effect of the particles |
Pure Mg [ AZ31 [ | Mg-18.8%Gd-2%BN | Groove?+?covering [ | The particles agglomerate and present streamlined distribution in pure Mg, while uniformly distributed in AZ31. The particle agglomeration leads to a doubling of microhardness in pure Mg. The addition of particles promotes the grain refinement and improves the strength and hardness of AZ31 |
AZ31 [ | Fly ash | Groove [ | The addition of fly ash particles promotes the grain refinement and improves the microhardness |
ZK60 [ AZ31 [ | Hydroxyapatite | Groove?+?covering [ | Reverse second pass of FSP is beneficial to the uniform distribution of nano-hydroxyapatite. The addition of nano-hydroxyapatite particles improves the corrosion resistance. Nano-hydroxyapatite promotes the grain refinement. AZ31/nano-hydroxyapatite composite material prepared by FSP has high biological activity. Acid treatment of AZ31/nano-hydroxyapatite composite material facilitates the decrease in the degradation rate, promoting biomineralization |
AZ31 [ | Stainless steel | Groove [ | The Mg alloy reinforced by 304 stainless steel powders has good tensile strength, hardness, corrosion resistance, and wear resistance |
Table 4 Brief summary of the work research carried out to produce FSPed Mg-based SMMCs as reported in the literature
Mg matrix | Reinforcing phase | Method of reinforcing particles introduction | Findings |
---|---|---|---|
Pure Mg [ AZ31 [ AZ91 [ RZ5 [ | MWCNTs | Groove?+?covering [ Groove [ Hole?+?melting?+?extrusion [ | The secondary phase strengthening and fine-grained strengthening of CNTs increase the microhardness of Mg-based SMMCs. CNTs lead to the occurrence of galvanic corrosion and the decrease in corrosion resistance of pure Mg. Low traverse speed is beneficial to the uniform distribution of MWCNTs. The elastic modulus, yield strength, and ultimate tensile strength increase, but the plasticity decreases |
AZ31 [ AZ91 [ | Carbon fiber | Sandwich [ | FSPed AZ91 Mg alloy has the characteristics of precipitation hardening and high hardness. The addition of carbon fibers reduces the plasticity of Mg-based SMMCs |
AZ31 [ AZ91 [ ZM21 [ | SiC | Hollow tool [ Groove [ Groove?+?covering [ Hole [ Hole?+?covering [ | The uniform distribution of SiC particles improves the strength of AZ91 Mg alloy. SiC particle-reinforced AZ91 Mg alloy has excellent friction and wear resistance. The microstructure with the addition of nano-SiC particles is more uniform than that with the addition of micron-SiC particles. Increasing the number of FSP passes can promote the uniform distribution of SiC particles |
AZ31 [ AZ61 [ | SiO2 | Groove [ Groove?+?covering [ | The addition of nano-SiO2 particles leads to the grain refinement and the formation of equiaxed ultrafine-grained structure. The hardness of Mg-based SMMCs reinforced by nano-SiO2 particles is increased by two times. Multipass FSP promotes the uniform distribution of SiO2 particles |
AZ31 [ AZ91 [ | Al2O3 | Groove?+?covering [ Groove [ | The distribution of Al2O3 particles is improved by increasing the rotational speed. Grain refinement is promoted by the addition of Al2O3 particles. Increasing the number of FSP passes can improve the uniformity of microstructure and refine grains |
RZ5 [ ZM21 [ | B4C | Groove?+?covering [ Hole?+?covering [ | Grain refinement is promoted by the addition of B4C particles. B4C particles promote wear resistance, due to grain boundary pinning and dispersion hardening |
AZ31 [ | TiC | Groove?+?covering [ Groove [ | TiC particles are uniformly distributed in the AZ31 Mg alloy matrix without agglomeration and interfacial reaction. TiC particles promote the grain refinement and the increase in microhardness |
AZ31 [ | ZrO2 | Groove [ | The addition of ZrO2 promotes the grain refinement and improves the strength and hardness of Mg-based SMMCs. Increasing the number of FSP passes reduces the particle agglomeration, promotes the grain refinement, and enhances the pinning effect of the particles |
Pure Mg [ AZ31 [ | Mg-18.8%Gd-2%BN | Groove?+?covering [ | The particles agglomerate and present streamlined distribution in pure Mg, while uniformly distributed in AZ31. The particle agglomeration leads to a doubling of microhardness in pure Mg. The addition of particles promotes the grain refinement and improves the strength and hardness of AZ31 |
AZ31 [ | Fly ash | Groove [ | The addition of fly ash particles promotes the grain refinement and improves the microhardness |
ZK60 [ AZ31 [ | Hydroxyapatite | Groove?+?covering [ | Reverse second pass of FSP is beneficial to the uniform distribution of nano-hydroxyapatite. The addition of nano-hydroxyapatite particles improves the corrosion resistance. Nano-hydroxyapatite promotes the grain refinement. AZ31/nano-hydroxyapatite composite material prepared by FSP has high biological activity. Acid treatment of AZ31/nano-hydroxyapatite composite material facilitates the decrease in the degradation rate, promoting biomineralization |
AZ31 [ | Stainless steel | Groove [ | The Mg alloy reinforced by 304 stainless steel powders has good tensile strength, hardness, corrosion resistance, and wear resistance |
|
[1] | Baojie Wang, Daokui Xu, Tianyu Zhao, Liyuan Sheng. Effect of CaCl2 and NaHCO3 in Physiological Saline Solution on the Corrosion Behavior of an As-Extruded Mg-Zn-Y-Nd alloy [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2021, 34(2): 239-247. |
[2] | Ce Zheng, Shuai-Feng Chen, Rui-Xue Wang, Shi-Hong Zhang, Ming Cheng. Effect of Hydrostatic Pressure on LPSO Kinking and Microstructure Evolution of Mg-11Gd-4Y-2Zn-0.5Zr Alloy [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2021, 34(2): 248-264. |
[3] | Jiaqi Hu, Qite Li, Hong Gao. Influence of Twinning Texture on the Corrosion Fatigue Behavior of Extruded Magnesium Alloys [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2021, 34(1): 65-76. |
[4] | Zheng-Zheng Yin, Zhao-Qi Zhang, Xiu-Juan Tian, Zhen-Lin Wang, Rong-Chang Zeng. Corrosion Resistance and Durability of Superhydrophobic Coating on AZ31 Mg Alloy via One-Step Electrodeposition [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2021, 34(1): 25-38. |
[5] | Meng Yan, Cong Wang, Tianjiao Luo, Yingju Li, Xiaohui Feng, Qiuyan Huang, Yuansheng Yang. Effect of Pulsed Magnetic Field on the Residual Stress of Rolled Magnium Alloy AZ31 Sheet [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2021, 34(1): 45-53. |
[6] | Lin-Yue Jia, Wen-Bo Du, Jin-Long Fu, Zhao-Hui Wang, Ke Liu, Shu-Bo Li, Xian Du. Obtaining Ultra-High Strength and Ductility in a Mg-Gd-Er-Zn-Zr Alloy via Extrusion, Pre-deformation and Two-Stage Aging [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2021, 34(1): 39-44. |
[7] | Fenghua Wang, Peng Su, Linxin Qin, Shuai Dong, Yunliang Li, Jie Dong. Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Mg-3Al-Zn Magnesium Alloy Sheet by Hot Shear Spinning [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2020, 33(9): 1226-1234. |
[8] | Li-Sha Wang, Jing-Hua Jiang, Bassiouny Saleh, Qiu-Yuan Xie, Qiong Xu, Huan Liu, Ai-Bin Ma. Controlling Corrosion Resistance of a Biodegradable Mg-Y-Zn Alloy with LPSO Phases via Multi-pass ECAP Process [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2020, 33(9): 1180-1190. |
[9] | Ning Li, Cun-Lei Jia, Zhi-Wei Wang, Li-Hui Wu, Ding-Rui Ni, Zheng-Kun Li, Hua-Meng Fu, Peng Xue, Bo-Lv Xiao, Zong-Yi Ma, Yi Shao, Yun-Long Chang. Achieving a High-Strength CoCrFeNiCu High-Entropy Alloy with an Ultrafine-Grained Structure via Friction Stir Processing [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2020, 33(7): 947-956. |
[10] | Kai-Bo Nie, Zhi-Hao Zhu, Paul Munroe, Kun-Kun Deng, Jun-Gang Han. Microstructure, Tensile Properties and Work Hardening Behavior of an Extruded Mg-Zn-Ca-Mn Magnesium Alloy [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2020, 33(7): 922-936. |
[11] | Yang Shao, Rong-Chang Zeng, Shuo-Qi Li, Lan-Yue Cui, Yu-Hong Zou, Shao-Kang Guan, Yu-Feng Zheng. Advance in Antibacterial Magnesium Alloys and Surface Coatings on Magnesium Alloys: A Review [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2020, 33(5): 615-629. |
[12] | Longlong Zhang, Yatong Zhang, Jinshan Zhang, Rui Zhao, Jiaxin Zhang, Chunxiang Xu. Effect of Alloyed Mo on Mechanical Properties, Biocorrosion and Cytocompatibility of As-Cast Mg-Zn-Y-Mn Alloys [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2020, 33(4): 500-513. |
[13] | Guercio Giuseppe Del, Manuela Galati, Abdollah Saboori, Paolo Fino, Luca Iuliano. Microstructure and Mechanical Performance of Ti-6Al-4V Lattice Structures Manufactured via Electron Beam Melting (EBM): A Review [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2020, 33(2): 183-203. |
[14] | Yan Dai, Xian-Hua Chen, Tao Yan, Ai-Tao Tang, Di Zhao, Zhu Luo, Chun-Quan Liu, Ren-Ju Cheng, Fu-Sheng Pan. Improved Corrosion Resistance in AZ61 Magnesium Alloys Induced by Impurity Reduction [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2020, 33(2): 225-232. |
[15] | A. Shah S., D. Wu, Chen R. S., Song G. S.. Temperature Effects on the Microstructures of Mg-Gd-Y Alloy Processed by Multi-direction Impact Forging [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2020, 33(2): 243-251. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||