First-Principles Study on Hexagonal WO3 for HCHO Gas Sensing Application

doi:10.1007/s40195-015-0260-6

摘要/Abstract

Abstract:

The adsorption energy, electronic structure, density of states, and electron population for adsorption of HCHO on the hexagonal WO₃ (h-WO₃) (001) surfaces were investigated by density functional theory calculations. The adsorption energy of HCHO molecule on W and O sites of WO-terminated h-WO₃ (001) surface was -0.309 and -0.432 eV compared with the value at -1.936 eV for HCHO molecule on O-terminated h-WO₃ (001) surface. According to the calculated results, the adsorption of HCHO on h-WO₃ (001) surface was spontaneous with physical adsorption on WO-terminated h-WO₃ (001) surface and chemisorption on O-terminated h-WO₃ (001) surface. The charge transfer from adsorbed HCHO molecule to WO₃ (001) surface was confirmed by the Mulliken population analysis, which suggested the potential application of h-WO₃ for HCHO gas detection.

Key words: Semiconductors, Surfaces, Crystal, structure, Electronic, structure

. [J]. 金属学报英文版, 2015, 28(6): 772-780.

Bo-Lin Tang, Guo-Hua Jiang, Wen-Xing Chen, Jun-Min Wan. First-Principles Study on Hexagonal WO₃ for HCHO Gas Sensing Application[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2015, 28(6): 772-780.

图/表 11

Table 1 Calculated and experimental values of the lattice parameters of h-WO3

Method	a (10^-1 nm)	c (10^-1 nm)	c/a	u	References
DFT-GGA-PBE	7.4169	3.8104	0.5137	0.5000	This work
DFT-GGA-PBE	7.410	3.808	0.514	0.500	[25]
DFT-GGA	7.410	3.814	0.515		[26]
Experimental	7.298	3.899	0.534	0.500	[27]

Fig. 1 The band structure of h-WO3 a, total DOS of h-WO3 b, PDOSs of W c, O d atoms for h-WO3

Fig. 2 Crystal structure of h-WO3 a, clean WO-terminated h-WO3 (001) surface after optimizing b, and optimized adsorption structures of HCHO on W5 (HCHO-W5 configuration) c, O7 (HCOH-O7 configuration) d site of WO-terminated h-WO3 (001) surface, respectively

Table 2 The bond angle and bond length or atomic distance for optimized free HCHO molecule and three HCHO-adsorbed configurations

Configuration	Bond angle (°)			Bond length/atomic distance (Å)
Configuration	O-C-H₁	O-C-H₂	H₁-C-H₂	C=O	C-H₁	C-H₂
HCHO	121.889	121.889	116.223	1.219	1.116	1.116
HCHO-W₅	121.369	121.365	117.266	1.221	1.110	1.111	O-W₅ (2.474)
HCOH-O₇	121.175	119.879	118.942	1.234	1.103	1.113	H₁-O₇ (2.356)
HCOH-O₁₆	110.039	126.835	116.347	1.207	2.024	1.098	H₁-O₁₆ (0.986)

Fig. 3 Total density of the states of HCHO-W5 a and HCOH-O7 b configurations; PDOSs of C and O atoms of HCHO molecule for HCHO-W5 c, HCOH-O7 d configurations

Fig. 4 The calculated electron density difference of the clean (001) surface a, HCHO-absorbed (001) surface for HCHO-W5 b, HCOH-O7 c configurations

Table 3 The Mulliken population analysis for HCHO-W5 configuration before and after HCHO adsorption

Atom	Before adsorption					After adsorption
Atom	s	p	d	Total	Charge (e)	s	p	d	Total	Charge (e)
O	1.84	4.64		6.48	-0.48	1.78	4.65		6.43	-0.43
C	1.26	2.80		4.06	-0.06	1.28	2.80		4.08	-0.08
H₁	0.73			0.73	0.27	0.67			0.67	0.33
H₂	0.73			0.73	0.27	0.67			0.67	0.33
W₅	2.32	6.26	3.64	12.22	1.78	2.34	6.31	3.66	12.31	1.69

Table 4 The Mulliken population analysis for HCOH-O7 configuration before and after HCHO adsorption

Atom	Before adsorption					After adsorption
Atom	s	p	d	Total	Charge (e)	s	p	d	Total	Charge (e)
O	1.84	4.64		6.48	-0.48	1.82	4.59		6.41	-0.41
C	1.26	2.80		4.06	-0.06	1.28	2.79		4.07	-0.07
H₁	0.73			0.73	0.27	0.75			0.75	0.25
H₂	0.73			0.73	0.27	0.65			0.65	0.35
O₇	1.86	4.83		6.69	-0.69	1.85	4.84		6.69	-0.69

Fig. 5 Clean O-terminated h-WO3 (001) surface a; optimized adsorption structures of HCHO on O16 (HCOH-O16 configuration) b; magnified image as marked with black ellipse in b image c; optimized structure for HCOOH molecule d

Fig. 6 Total density of states of HCOH-O16 configurations a; PDOSs of C and O16 atoms after adsorption b; PDOSs of O16 and W5 atoms before and after adsorption c; PDOSs of C and H1 atoms before and after adsorption d

Table 5 The Mulliken population analysis for HCOH-O16 configuration before and after HCHO adsorption

Atom	Before adsorption					After adsorption
Atom	s	p	d	Total	Charge (e)	s	p	d	Total	Charge (e)
O	1.84	4.64		6.48	-0.48	1.85	4.74		6.59	-0.59
C	1.26	2.80		4.06	-0.06	1.08	2.55		3.63	0.38
H₁	0.73			0.73	0.27	0.5			0.5	0.5
H₂	0.73			0.73	0.27	0.64			0.64	0.36
O₁₆	1.86	4.83		6.69	-0.69	1.83	4.83		6.66	-0.66

参考文献 32

[1]	Y. Suzuki, N. Nakano, K. Suzuki,Environ. Sci. Technol. 37, 5695(2003)
[2]	Z. Wang, J. Liu, F. Wang, S. Chen, H. Luo, X. Yu, J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 13577 (2010)
[3]	B. Geng, C. Fang, F. Zhan, N. Yu, Small 4, 1337 (2008)
[4]	M. Epifani, E. Comini, R. Díaz, J. Arbiol, P. Siciliano, G. Sberveglieri, J. Morante, Sens. Actuators B 118, 105 (2006)
[5]	G. Korotcenkov, Mater. Sci. Eng. B 139, 1 (2007)
[6]	M. Ippommatsu, H. Ohnishi, H. Sasaki, T. Matsumoto, J. Appl. Phys. 69, 8368(1991)
[7]	L. Deng, X. Ding, D. Zeng, S. Tian, H. Li, C. Xie, Sens. Actuators B 163, 260 (2012)
[8]	M. Law, H. Kind, B. Messer, F. Kim, P. Yang,Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 114, 2511(2002)
[9]	E. Comini, G. Faglia, G. Sberveglieri, Z. Pan, Z. Wang,Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 1869(2002)
[10]	Y. Wang, X. Jiang, Y. Xia, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 16176(2003)
[11]	Y. Qin, X. Li, F. Wang, M. Hu, J. Alloys Compd. 509, 8401(2011)
[12]	D. Hua, M. Liu, Y. Qin, J. Alloys Compd. 587, 227(2014)
[13]	M. Ahsana, T. Tesfamichaela, M. Ionescub, J. Bella, N. Mottaa, Sens. Actuators B 162, 14 (2012)
[14]	C. MateiGhimbeu, M. Lumbreras, M. Siadat, J. Schoonman,Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 13, 1(2010)
[15]	J. Wang, P. Zhang, J. Qi, P. Yao, Actuators B 136, 399 (2009)
[16]	S. Pokhrel, C. Simion, V. Teodorescu, N. Barsan, U. Weimar,Adv. Funct. Mater. 19, 1767(2009)
[17]	Y. Xu, Z. Tang, Z. Zhang, Y. Ji, Z. Zhou,Sens. Lett. 6, 938(2008)
[18]	I. Szilágyi, S. Saukko, J. Mizsei, P. Király, G. Tárkányi, A. Tóth, A. Szabó, K. Varga-Josepovits, J. Madarász, G. Pokol, Mater. Sci. Forum 589, 161 (2008)
[19]	I. Szilágyia, L. Wang, P. Gouma, C. Balázsi, J. Madarász, G. Pokold,Mater. Res. Bull. 44, 505(2009)
[20]	C. Wang, F. Wang, X. Fu, E. Zhang, Z. Xu, Chin. Phys. B 20, 210 (2011)
[21]	L. Zhao, F. Tian, X. Wang, W. Zhao, A. Fu, Y. Shen, S. Chen, S. Yu,Comput. Mater. Sci. 79, 691(2013)
[22]	Z. Zhao, X. He, J. Yi, C. Ma, Y. Cao, J. Qiu,RSC Adv. 3, 84(2013)
[23]	B. Sun, W. Chen, J. Zheng, C. Lu,Appl. Surf. Sci. 255, 3141(2008)
[24]	J. Scaranto, S. Giorgianni,Mol. Phys. 106, 2425(2008)
[25]	X. Wang, F. Tian, W. Zhao, A. Fu, L. Zhao,Comput. Mater. Sci. 68, 218(2013)
[26]	B. Ingham, S. Hendy, S. Chong, J. Tallon, Phys. Rev. B 72, 075109 (2005)
[27]	B. Gerand, G. Novogorocki, J. Guenot, M. Figlarz, J. Solid, State Chem. 29, 429(1979)
[28]	A. Kaushal, D. Kaur, J. Nanopart. Res. 13, 2485(2011)
[29]	C. Filippi, D. Singh, C. Umrigar, Phys. Rev. B 50, 14947 (1994)
[30]	C. Lambert-Mauriat, V. Oison, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 18, 7361 (2006)
[31]	Y. Shi, M. Wang, C. Hong, Z. Yang, J. Deng, X. Song, L. Wang, J. Shao, H. Liu, Y. Ding, Sens. Actuators B 177, 1027 (2013)
[32]	Y. Xue, Z. Tang, Sens. Actuators B 138, 108 (2009)

First-Principles Study on Hexagonal WO₃ for HCHO Gas Sensing Application

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 11

参考文献 32

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价