First Principles Study of CoSb3/Ni Interface Structure and Mechanical Properties

doi:10.1007/s40195-025-01830-4

摘要/Abstract

Abstract:

Mechanical stability is critically essential in the design of thermoelectric devices. In this study, we employed first-principles calculations based on density functional theory to investigate the failure mechanisms at the CoSb₃/Ni interface. Our findings reveal that the CoSb₃(100)/Ni(100) and CoSb₃(100)/Ni(111)_1 configurations are favorable interface structures. The ideal tensile strength of the CoSb₃/Ni interface is markedly lower than that of bulk CoSb₃, which can be attributed to structural rearrangements near the interface that weaken the strength of the Co-Sb bonds. Interface failure occurs in CoSb₃, where covalent Sb-Sb bonds exhibit a tendency to soften prior to the ionic Co-Sb bonds due to their comparatively lower rigidity. Consequently, the breakage of the Co-Sb bonds leads to interface failure. Structural failure at both single-layer Sb_CoSb₃(100)/Ni(100) and single-layer Sb_CoSb₃(100)/Ni(111)_1 interfaces results from ruptures in intermediate Co-Sb bonds in CoSb₃, whereas failures at double-layer Sb_CoSb₃(100)/Ni(100) and double-layer Sb_CoSb₃(100)/Ni(111)_1 interfaces stem from fractures in the uppermost Co-Sb bonds. This behavior is primarily driven by atomic rearrangements near the single-layer Sb_CoSb₃ interface, which promote bond formation between Sb-Ni and Co-Ni, thereby enhancing stability within the superstructure of CoSb₃. This study will provide a theoretical basis for the interface design of thermoelectric devices.

Key words: Thermoelectric, Intercfacial structure, Ideal tensile strength, Failure mechanism

. [J]. 金属学报英文版, 2025, 38(5): 793-802.

Cuicui Shu, Pengcheng Zhai, Xiege Huang, Sergey I. Morozov, Guodong Li, Zhiyuan Pan. First Principles Study of CoSb₃/Ni Interface Structure and Mechanical Properties[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2025, 38(5): 793-802.

图/表 8

Fig. 1 Crystal structure: a crystal structure of CoSb3, the Co and Sb atoms represented with dark-blue and brown spheres; b crystal structure of Ni, the Ni atom represented with blue sphere

Table 1 Calculated surface energies, γ, for typical low-index surface for Ni

Ni(100)	Ni(110)	Ni(111)
2.574	2.596	2.271

Table 2 Ef calculated for ten kinds of CoSb3/Ni interfacial structures

Configurations	Formation energy (J/m²)
Single-layer Sb_CoSb₃(100)/Ni(100)	− 1.932
Single-layer Sb_CoSb₃(100)/Ni(110)_1	− 1.140
Single-layer Sb_CoSb₃(100)/Ni(110)_2	− 1.113
Single-layer Sb_CoSb₃(100)/Ni(111)_1	− 1.552
Single-layer Sb_CoSb₃(100)/Ni(111_2	− 1.738
Double-layer Sb_CoSb₃(100)/Ni(100)	− 1.948
Double-layer Sb_CoSb₃(100)/Ni(110)_1	− 1.239
Double-layer Sb_CoSb₃(100)/Ni(110)_2	− 0.934
Double-layer Sb_CoSb₃(100)/Ni(111)_1	− 1.401
Double-layer Sb_CoSb₃(100)/Ni(111)_2	− 1.484

Fig. 2 Tensile stress as a function of tensile strain: a interfaces of CoSb3(100)/Ni(100), b corresponding defect-free single crystals of CoSb3(100) and Ni(100), c interfaces of CoSb3(100)/Ni(111), d corresponding defect-free single crystals of CoSb3(100) and Ni(111)

Fig. 3 Crystal structures of the single-layer Sb_CoSb3(100)/Ni(100) interface during the tensile process: a structure at 0.173 strain corresponding to ideal tensile strength, b structure at the failure strain of 0.196. c The bond lengths (Sb1-Sb2, Sb3-Sb4, Co1-Sb5, Co2-Sb6, Co3-Sb7, Co4-Sb8 bonds) with the increasing tensile strain during the tensile process

Fig. 4 Crystal structures of the double-layer Sb_CoSb3(100)/Ni(100) interface during the tensile process: a structure at 0.105 strain corresponding to the ideal strength, b structure at 0.127 strain before failure strain and c structure at the failure strain of 0.149. d The bond lengths (Co1-Sb1, Co2-Sb2, Co3-Sb3, Co4-Sb4, Sb5-Sb6, Sb7-Sb8 bonds) with the increasing tensile strain during the tensile process

Fig. 5 Crystal structures of the single-layer Sb_CoSb3(100)/Ni(111)_1 interface during the tensile process: a structure at 0.196 strain before failure strain and b structure at the failure strain of 0.208. c The bond lengths (Co1-Sb1, Co2-Sb2, Co3-Sb3, Co4-Sb4, Sb5-Sb7, Sb6-Sb8, Ni1-Sb5, Ni2-Co2 bonds) with the increasing tensile strain during the tensile process

Fig. 6 Crystal structures of the double-layer Sb_CoSb3(100)/Ni(111) interface during the tensile process: a structure at 0.094 strain before failure strain and b structure at the failure strain of 0.105. c The bond lengths (Co1-Sb1, Co2-Sb2, Co3-Sb3, Co4-Sb4, Ni1-Sb5, Ni2-Sb6, Ni3-Sb7 bonds) with the increasing tensile strain during the tensile process

参考文献 39

[1]	G.J. Snyder, E.S. Toberer, Nat. Mater. 7, 105 (2008)
[2]	L.E. Bell, Science 321, 1457 (2008) DOI PMID
[3]	C. Stiewe, D. Ebling, E. Müller, Gefahrst. Reinhalt. Luft 77, 502 (2017)
[4]	D. Champier, Energy Conv. Manag. 140, 167 (2017)
[5]	P.P. Chen, H.Y. Xie, L.D. Zhao, Acta Metall. Sin.-Engl. Lett. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40195-024-01798-7
[6]	X.C. Guan, Z.Y. Liu, N. Ma, Z. Li, J. Liu, H.Y. Zhang, H.L. Li, Q. Ba, J.J. Ma, C.G. Jin, A.L. Xia, Acta Metall. Sin.-Engl. Lett. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40195-024-01794-x
[7]	S.Q. Lin, S.Y. Wang, Y.J. Li, Z.Y. Lai, X.T. Yang, X.Y. Lu, M. Jin, Acta Metall. Sin.-Engl. Lett. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40195-024-01790-1
[8]	Y.T. Fan, C.H. Xie, J. Li, X.Y. Meng, J.C. Sun, J.S. Wu, X.F. Tang, G.J. Tan, Energy Environ. Mater. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1002/eem2.12535
[9]	G. Rogl, P. Rogl, Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 4, 50 (2017)
[10]	G. Rogl, A. Grytsiv, P. Rogl, N. Peranio, E. Bauer, M. Zehetbauer, O. Eibl, Acta Mater. 63, 30 (2014)
[11]	Z.Y. Liu, J.L. Zhu, X. Tong, S. Niu, W.Y. Zhao, J. Adv. Ceram. 9, 647 (2020)
[12]	L.X. Zhang, H. Pan, Z. Sun, H.Y. Geng, Y.S. Xu, Q. Chang, B. Zhang, A.C.S. Appl. Mater. Interfaces 15, 59912 (2023)
[13]	Z. Sun, X. Chen, J.C. Zhang, H.Y. Geng, L. Zhang, J. Materiomics 8, 882 (2022)
[14]	S.W. Chen, Z.W. Liu, H.S. Chu, Z.Y. Huang, J. Alloy. Compd. 731, 111 (2018)
[15]	A.F. Musa, S.W. Chen, J. Electron. Mater. 49, 6068 (2020)
[16]	W.A. Chen, S.W. Chen, S.M. Tseng, H.W. Hsiao, Y.Y. Chen, G.J. Snyder, Y.L. Tang, J. Alloy. Compd. 632, 500 (2015)
[17]	J.Q. Zhang, P. Wei, H.Q. Zhang, L.Z. Li, W.T. Zhu, X.L. Nie, W.Y. Zhao, Q.J. Zhang, A.C.S. Appl. Mater. Interfaces 15, 22705 (2023)
[18]	S.J. Joo, J.E. Lee, B.S. Kim, B.K. Min, Materials 13, 3117 (2020)
[19]	D.G. Zhao, X.Y. Li, L. He, W. Jiang, L.D. Chen, J. Alloy. Compd. 477, 425 (2009)
[20]	D.G. Zhao, H.R. Geng, X.Y. Teng, J. Alloy. Compd. 517, 198 (2012)
[21]	Q.H. Zhang, J.C. Liao, Y.S. Tang, M. Gu, R.H. Liu, S.Q. Bai, L.D. Chen, J. Inorg. Mater. 33, 889 (2018)
[22]	V. Trivedi, M. Battabyal, B.S. Murty, R. Gopalan, Ceram. Int. 48, 29175 (2022)
[23]	X. Shao, R.H. Liu, L. Wang, J. Chu, G.H. Bai, S.Q. Bai, M. Gu, L.N. Zhang, W. Ma, L.D. Chen, J. Inorg. Mater. 35, 224 (2020)
[24]	F. Kresse, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996) DOI PMID
[25]	G. Kresse, J. Furthmüller, Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15 (1996)
[26]	K. Momma, F. Izumi, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 41, 653 (2008)
[27]	M. Nielsen, Phys. Rev. B 32, 3780 (1985) PMID
[28]	D. Roundy, C.R. Krenn, M.L. Cohen, J.W. Morris, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2713 (1999)
[29]	S.Q. Hao, B. Delley, C. Stampfl, Phys. Rev. B 74, 035402 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.74.035402
[30]	S.Q. Hao, B. Delley, S. Veprek, C. Stampfl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 086102 (2006)
[31]	T. Schmidt, G. Kliche, H.D. Lutz, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C-Cryst. Struct. Commun. 43, 1678 (1987)
[32]	R.J. Birgeneau, J. Cordes, G. Dolling, A.D.B. Woods, Phys. Rev. 136, A1359 (1964)
[33]	G.D. Li, S.G. Hao, U. Aydemir, M. Wood, W.A. Goddard, P.C. Zhai, Q.J. Zhang, G.J. Snyder, A.C.S. Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 31968 (2016)
[34]	S.Q. Hao, B. Delley, C. Stampfl, Phys. Rev. B 74, 035424 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.74.035424
[35]	G.D. Li, Q. An, W.J. Li, W.A. Goddard, P.C. Zhai, Q.J. Zhang, G.J. Snyder, Chem. Mat. 27, 6329 (2015)
[36]	G.D. Li, S. Bajaj, U. Aydemir, S.Q. Hao, H. Xiao, W.A. Goddard, P.C. Zhai, Q.J. Zhang, G.J. Snyder, Chem. Mat. 28, 2172 (2016)
[37]	S.H. Park, Y. Jin, J. Cha, K. Hong, Y. Kim, H. Yoon, C.Y. Yoo, I. Chung, ACS Appl. Energ. Mater. 1, 1603 (2018)
[38]	X. Bao, M. Gu, Q.H. Zhang, Z.H. Wu, S.Q. Bai, L.D. Chen, H.Q. Xie, J. Electron. Mater. 48, 5523 (2019)
[39]	K. Placha, R.S. Tuley, M. Salvo, V. Casalegno, K. Simpson, Materials 11, 2483 (2018)

First Principles Study of CoSb₃/Ni Interface Structure and Mechanical Properties

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 39

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价