Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters) ›› 2019, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3): 305-320.DOI: 10.1007/s40195-018-0750-4
所属专题: 2019年镁合金专辑; 2019年腐蚀专辑-2
收稿日期:
2018-01-13
修回日期:
2018-03-01
出版日期:
2019-03-10
发布日期:
2019-02-22
作者简介:
Huan Liu is a Lecturer, Master’s Supervisor, College of Mechanics and Materials, Hohai University. He earned his Ph.D. from Southeast University in 2014 and then became a Lecturer in Hohai University. He was selected into the “Shuangchuang Program of Jiangsu Province” and “Dayu Scholars Program of Hohai University” in 2017. So far, he has published more than 30 scientific papers (indexed by SCI) and held 2 authorized Chinese patents. His papers were cited more than 200 times. His research interests mainly include design of high-strength and high ductility magnesium alloys, heat-resistant magnesium alloys, fabrication of fine-grained and ultra-fine-grained metallic materials, and biomedical materials.
Xian-Hua Chen is a Professor of Chongqing University and received his Doctor’s degree from Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences in 2008. He is Director of Institute of Functional Mg Alloys in National Engineering Research Centre for Magnesium Alloys, Director of International Joint Laboratory for Light Alloys (Ministry of Education), Editorial Board of Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters) (SCI). His research work is focused on new high-performance structural and functional magnesium alloys, and purification technology of magnesium alloys. He also worked in Materials Technology Laboratory of CANMET in Canada as visiting scientist during 2012-2013. He has 22 patents, 1 book and more than 60 SCI papers, including 2 science papers. His papers were cited more than 2700 times. He was awarded the Provincial and Ministerial S&T Prize in 2013, 2014 and 2017. He was the Chairman of “The 2nd China Youth Scholars Conference on Mg Alloys.”
Jia-Hui Dong1,2, Li-Li Tan1(), Yi-Bin Ren1, Ke Yang1
Received:
2018-01-13
Revised:
2018-03-01
Online:
2019-03-10
Published:
2019-02-22
. [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2019, 32(3): 305-320.
Jia-Hui Dong, Li-Li Tan, Yi-Bin Ren, Ke Yang. Effect of Microstructure on Corrosion Behavior of Mg-Sr Alloy in Hank’s Solution[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2019, 32(3): 305-320.
Sample | Solution treatment | Aging treatment | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Temperature (°C) | Time (h) | Temperature (°C) | Time (h) | |
T4-450 °C | 450 | 5 | - | - |
T4-560 °C | 560 | 5 | - | - |
T6-10 h | 560 | 5 | 200 | 10 |
T6-24 h | 560 | 5 | 200 | 24 |
T6-40 h | 560 | 5 | 200 | 40 |
Table 1 Heat treatments for as-extruded Mg-Sr alloy
Sample | Solution treatment | Aging treatment | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Temperature (°C) | Time (h) | Temperature (°C) | Time (h) | |
T4-450 °C | 450 | 5 | - | - |
T4-560 °C | 560 | 5 | - | - |
T6-10 h | 560 | 5 | 200 | 10 |
T6-24 h | 560 | 5 | 200 | 24 |
T6-40 h | 560 | 5 | 200 | 40 |
Fig. 1 Microstructures of as-cast Mg-Sr alloy: a optical micrograph, b higher magnification showing braid shape bands within grain, c SEM micrograph, d EDS line scan analyses
Fig. 2 Optical micrographs of as-extruded Mg-Sr alloy under different heat treatments shown by transversal and longitudinal sections: a1 and a2 before heat treatment, b1 and b2 T4-450 °C, c1 and c2 T4-560 °C, d1 and d2 T6-10 h, e1 and e2 T6-24 h, f1 and f2 T6-40 h
Fig. 5 SEM micrographs of as-extruded Mg-1.5Sr alloy under different heat treatments shown by transversal and longitudinal sections: a1 and a2 before heat treatment, b1 and b2 T4-450 °C, c1 and c2 T4-560 °C, d1 and d2 T6-10 h, e1 and e2 T6-24 h, f1 and f2 T6-40 h
Fig. 7 SEM micrographs showing corroded surface of Mg-1.5Sr alloy immersed in Hank’s solution for 3 d (a1-c1) and 9 d (a2-b2): a1 and a2 as-cast alloy, b1 and b2 transversal section as-extruded alloy, c1 and c2 longitudinal section of as-extruded alloy
Fig. 8 SEM micrographs showing corrosion morphologies of β phase and cross sections of Mg-1.5Sr alloy exhibiting the depth of corrosion pit after 3-d immersion in Hank’s solution: a1 and a2 as-cast alloy, b1 and b2 transversal section of as-extruded alloy, c1 and c2 longitudinal section
Fig. 9 a Variation of pH and b weight loss rate for extruded Mg-1.5Sr alloy under different heat treatments immersed in Hank’s solution as a function of immersion time
Fig. 10 Optical micrographs showing corrosion morphologies of extruded Mg-1.5Sr alloy under different heat treatments after 14-d immersion: a before heat treatment, b T4-450 °C, c T4-560 °C, d T6-10 h, e T6-24 h, f T6-40 h
Fig. 11 Potentiodynamic polarization curves of Mg-1.5Sr alloy: a as-cast and as-extruded alloy, b solution-treated alloy, c solution followed by aging alloy
Sample | Ecorr (V vs. SCE) | Icorr (μA cm-2) | βc (V dec-1) | Corrosion rate (mm y-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
As-cast | - 1.740 | 10.468 | 0.308 | 0.236 |
Ex-t | - 1.630 | 4.951 | 0.226 | 0.112 |
Ex-l | - 1.640 | 6.617 | 0.260 | 0.149 |
T4-450 °C | - 1.600 | 4.731 | 0.215 | 0.107 |
T4-560 °C | - 1.640 | 6.775 | 0.235 | 0.153 |
T6-10 h | - 1.650 | 7.702 | 0.201 | 0.174 |
T6-24 h | - 1.650 | 9.855 | 0.231 | 0.222 |
T6-40 h | - 1.690 | 14.115 | 0.194 | 0.318 |
Table 2 Ecorr, βc and Icorr obtained from Tafel fitting for differently treated Mg-1.5Sr alloy in Hank’ s solution
Sample | Ecorr (V vs. SCE) | Icorr (μA cm-2) | βc (V dec-1) | Corrosion rate (mm y-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
As-cast | - 1.740 | 10.468 | 0.308 | 0.236 |
Ex-t | - 1.630 | 4.951 | 0.226 | 0.112 |
Ex-l | - 1.640 | 6.617 | 0.260 | 0.149 |
T4-450 °C | - 1.600 | 4.731 | 0.215 | 0.107 |
T4-560 °C | - 1.640 | 6.775 | 0.235 | 0.153 |
T6-10 h | - 1.650 | 7.702 | 0.201 | 0.174 |
T6-24 h | - 1.650 | 9.855 | 0.231 | 0.222 |
T6-40 h | - 1.690 | 14.115 | 0.194 | 0.318 |
Fig. 12 EIS measurement results of Mg-Sr alloy: a and b Nyquist plots acquired at 1-h immersion in Hank’s solution, c equivalent circuit for EIS data fitting, d fitted Rtp and Rfp (ZRe: real part of impedance; Zim: imaginary part of impedance; R: impedance)
Sample | Rs (Ω cm-2) | Rtp (Ω cm-2) | CPE1 (F cm-2) | n 1 | Rfp (Ω cm-2) | CPE2 (F cm-2) | n 2 | L (H cm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
As-cast | 12.92 | 7689 | 2.20E-05 | 0.7425 | 62.19 | 1.02E-05 | 0.6977 | 10.60 |
Ex-t | 15.57 | 1.47E + 04 | 1.76E-05 | 0.7657 | 113.00 | 3.09E-05 | 0.3911 | 17.69 |
Ex-l | 12.02 | 1.28E + 04 | 1.61E-05 | 0.7362 | 91.92 | 3.58E-05 | 0.5732 | 18.36 |
T4-450 °C | 13.14 | 1.56E + 04 | 1.66E-05 | 0.7662 | 110.5 | 1.43E-05 | 0.6578 | 29.72 |
T4-560 °C | 14.58 | 9449 | 1.90E-05 | 0.7689 | 87.42 | 1.28E-05 | 0.6793 | 18.58 |
T6-10 h | 17.1 | 8958 | 2.02E-05 | 0.7523 | 57.65 | 1.87E-05 | 0.6049 | 23.40 |
T6-24 h | 10.09 | 7637 | 2.01E-05 | 0.7681 | 87.16 | 1.69E-05 | 0.652 | 21.63 |
T6-40 h | 20.52 | 6750 | 2.41E-05 | 0.7288 | 43.50 | 4.46E-07 | 0.3635 | 25.78 |
Table 3 Fitting results of Mg-Sr alloy immersed in Hank’s for 1 h
Sample | Rs (Ω cm-2) | Rtp (Ω cm-2) | CPE1 (F cm-2) | n 1 | Rfp (Ω cm-2) | CPE2 (F cm-2) | n 2 | L (H cm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
As-cast | 12.92 | 7689 | 2.20E-05 | 0.7425 | 62.19 | 1.02E-05 | 0.6977 | 10.60 |
Ex-t | 15.57 | 1.47E + 04 | 1.76E-05 | 0.7657 | 113.00 | 3.09E-05 | 0.3911 | 17.69 |
Ex-l | 12.02 | 1.28E + 04 | 1.61E-05 | 0.7362 | 91.92 | 3.58E-05 | 0.5732 | 18.36 |
T4-450 °C | 13.14 | 1.56E + 04 | 1.66E-05 | 0.7662 | 110.5 | 1.43E-05 | 0.6578 | 29.72 |
T4-560 °C | 14.58 | 9449 | 1.90E-05 | 0.7689 | 87.42 | 1.28E-05 | 0.6793 | 18.58 |
T6-10 h | 17.1 | 8958 | 2.02E-05 | 0.7523 | 57.65 | 1.87E-05 | 0.6049 | 23.40 |
T6-24 h | 10.09 | 7637 | 2.01E-05 | 0.7681 | 87.16 | 1.69E-05 | 0.652 | 21.63 |
T6-40 h | 20.52 | 6750 | 2.41E-05 | 0.7288 | 43.50 | 4.46E-07 | 0.3635 | 25.78 |
|
No related articles found! |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||